Literature DB >> 18518162

Who's talking first? Consensus or lack thereof in coevolving opinion formation models.

Cecilia Nardini1, Balázs Kozma, Alain Barrat.   

Abstract

We investigate different opinion formation models on adaptive network topologies. Depending on the dynamical process, rewiring can either (i) lead to the elimination of interactions between agents in different states, and accelerate the convergence to a consensus state or break the network in noninteracting groups or (ii), counterintuitively, favor the existence of diverse interacting groups for exponentially long times. The mean-field analysis allows us to elucidate the mechanisms at play. Strikingly, allowing the interacting agents to bear more than one opinion at the same time drastically changes the model's behavior and leads to fast consensus.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18518162     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.158701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  5 in total

1.  Microdynamics in stationary complex networks.

Authors:  Aurelien Gautreau; Alain Barrat; Marc Barthélemy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Opinion formation on dynamic networks: identifying conditions for the emergence of partisan echo chambers.

Authors:  Tucker Evans; Feng Fu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Are opinions based on science: modelling social response to scientific facts.

Authors:  Gerardo Iñiguez; Julia Tagüeña-Martínez; Kimmo K Kaski; Rafael A Barrio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clustered marginalization of minorities during social transitions induced by co-evolution of behaviour and network structure.

Authors:  Carl-Friedrich Schleussner; Jonathan F Donges; Denis A Engemann; Anders Levermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Bounded Confidence under Preferential Flip: A Coupled Dynamics of Structural Balance and Opinions.

Authors:  Antonio Parravano; Ascensión Andina-Díaz; Miguel A Meléndez-Jiménez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.