Linda Brubaker1, Susan Shott, Janet Tomezsko, Roger P Goldberg. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60153, USA. LBrubaker@lumc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Typically, pelvic muscle training for women with pelvic floor disorders is provided by medical personnel. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and symptom improvement after a nonmedical pelvic muscle training class in a prospective cohort. METHODS: Study participants volunteered to participate in an 11-week pelvic fitness and education class taught by a lay instructor at five fitness classrooms in the Chicago area. Participation was limited to adult women who verbally indicated that their pelvic symptoms included a minimum of some urge urinary symptom. Standardized assessments were completed before class, at the end of class, and 1 year after completion of the classes. These assessments included the 12-item short-form, validated pelvic questionnaires (Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire), and self-reported goals selection and achievement. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 102 participants provided before and after class data, and 76 also provided 1-year data. Participants had a mean age of 58 years and a mean body mass index of 26.3. Most (91%) were white, and 63% had at least completed college. After class improvements in Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form bothersomeness ratings were noted for all items and maintained at 1 year for all but pain or discomfort. Significant quality-of-life and sexual function improvements were reported after class and at 1 year. The 12-item short-form responses documented improvements in six areas of general health. The most important self-selected goal was achieved in 71% after class and maintained by 67% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Nonmedical pelvic fitness classes are promising for pelvic symptom improvement in self-selected participants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: Typically, pelvic muscle training for women with pelvic floor disorders is provided by medical personnel. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and symptom improvement after a nonmedical pelvic muscle training class in a prospective cohort. METHODS: Study participants volunteered to participate in an 11-week pelvic fitness and education class taught by a lay instructor at five fitness classrooms in the Chicago area. Participation was limited to adult women who verbally indicated that their pelvic symptoms included a minimum of some urge urinary symptom. Standardized assessments were completed before class, at the end of class, and 1 year after completion of the classes. These assessments included the 12-item short-form, validated pelvic questionnaires (Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire), and self-reported goals selection and achievement. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 102 participants provided before and after class data, and 76 also provided 1-year data. Participants had a mean age of 58 years and a mean body mass index of 26.3. Most (91%) were white, and 63% had at least completed college. After class improvements in Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form bothersomeness ratings were noted for all items and maintained at 1 year for all but pain or discomfort. Significant quality-of-life and sexual function improvements were reported after class and at 1 year. The 12-item short-form responses documented improvements in six areas of general health. The most important self-selected goal was achieved in 71% after class and maintained by 67% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Nonmedical pelvic fitness classes are promising for pelvic symptom improvement in self-selected participants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Patrick J Culligan; Janet Scherer; Keisha Dyer; Jennifer L Priestley; Geri Guingon-White; Donna Delvecchio; Margi Vangeli Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Diane Borello-France; Kathryn L Burgio; Patricia S Goode; Alayne D Markland; Kimberly Kenton; Aarthi Balasubramanyam; Anne M Stoddard Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2010-07-29
Authors: Sophia Delpe Goodridge; Leah P Chisholm; Jessica Heft; Siobhan Hartigan; Melissa Kaufman; Roger R Dmochowski; Thomas Stewart; William Stuart Reynolds Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 1.913