BACKGROUND: While more sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays may overcome current limitations in diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS), clinicians and laboratorians are concerned about the clinical impact of higher rates of cTn positivity. METHODS: We collected statistics on test volume and positivity rates before and after the implementation of a more sensitive assay. We divided patients into 6 groups based on their cardiac troponin I (cTnI) results and utilized additional laboratory test results to determine the impact of the new assay. In addition, we assessed the clinical significance of low-positive cTnI results (0.05-0.10 microg/l). RESULTS: Lowering the diagnostic cutoff from 0.10 to 0.04 microg/l increased the number of positive test results by 44.2% hospital-wide and 114.4% in the emergency department without significantly changing test volume. In some patients, low-positive results were part of the typical rise and fall of cTnI consistent with myocardial damage. Diagnosis was more challenging in patients with consistently low-positive results. Patients in this group were significantly more likely to have impaired renal function than those with cTnI elevations >0.10 microg/l. CONCLUSIONS: More sensitive cTn assays will increase the number of positive results and allow for earlier detection of cardiac injury while also detecting non-ACS related pathologies.
BACKGROUND: While more sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays may overcome current limitations in diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS), clinicians and laboratorians are concerned about the clinical impact of higher rates of cTn positivity. METHODS: We collected statistics on test volume and positivity rates before and after the implementation of a more sensitive assay. We divided patients into 6 groups based on their cardiac troponin I (cTnI) results and utilized additional laboratory test results to determine the impact of the new assay. In addition, we assessed the clinical significance of low-positive cTnI results (0.05-0.10 microg/l). RESULTS: Lowering the diagnostic cutoff from 0.10 to 0.04 microg/l increased the number of positive test results by 44.2% hospital-wide and 114.4% in the emergency department without significantly changing test volume. In some patients, low-positive results were part of the typical rise and fall of cTnI consistent with myocardial damage. Diagnosis was more challenging in patients with consistently low-positive results. Patients in this group were significantly more likely to have impaired renal function than those with cTnI elevations >0.10 microg/l. CONCLUSIONS: More sensitive cTn assays will increase the number of positive results and allow for earlier detection of cardiac injury while also detecting non-ACS related pathologies.
Authors: Peter Wrigley; Jane Khoury; Bryan Eckerle; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Daniel Woo; Mathew L Flaherty; Felipe De Los Rios la Rosa; Jason Mackey; Opeolu Adeoye; Sharyl Martini; Simona Ferioli; Brett M Kissela; Dawn O Kleindorfer Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Viviany R Taqueti; Brendan M Everett; Venkatesh L Murthy; Mariya Gaber; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kuan Ken Lee; Ala Noaman; Amar Vaswani; Matthew Gibbins; Megan Griffiths; Andrew R Chapman; Fiona Strachan; Atul Anand; David A McAllister; David E Newby; Alasdair J Gray; Nicholas L Mills; Anoop S V Shah Journal: Am J Med Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Anoop S V Shah; Yader Sandoval; Ala Noaman; Anne Sexter; Amar Vaswani; Stephen W Smith; Mathew Gibbins; Megan Griffiths; Andrew R Chapman; Fiona E Strachan; Atul Anand; Martin A Denvir; Philip D Adamson; Michelle S D'Souza; Alasdair J Gray; David A McAllister; David E Newby; Fred S Apple; Nicholas L Mills Journal: BMJ Date: 2017-11-07
Authors: Michael Sternberg; Evasio Pasini; Carol Chen-Scarabelli; Giovannii Corsetti; Hemang Patel; Daniele Linardi; Francesco Onorati; Giuseppe Faggian; Tiziano Scarabelli; Louis Saravolatz Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2019-09-22