Literature DB >> 18515045

Functional and radiographic long-term results after bad split in orthognathic surgery.

R B Veras1, M S Kriwalsky, S Hoffmann, P Maurer, J Schubert.   

Abstract

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is a standard procedure in orthognathic surgery. The aim of the present study was to perform a matched pair analysis (bad sagittal split versus regular sagittal split) regarding the functional and radiographic long-term results after BSSO. Of 110 cases of mandibular hypoplasy treated with BSSO, 7 cases of bad sagittal splits (Group A) were selected, clinically examined and matched to 7 cases where no bad split occurred (Group B). The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporo Mandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), condylar morphology scale (CMS) and ramus height measurements using orthopantomograms were carried out in the follow-up period to observe the clinical and functional status and condylar resorbtion or remodelling. The mean follow-up time was 28.6 months. The RDC/TMD examination did not show a higher incidence of temporomandibular dysfunction, including pain or clicking in the bad split group. Patients without a bad split showed statistically significant (p<0.05) better mouth opening. The CMS measurements were comparable in both groups. When compared with regular splits, bad splits, if treated in an appropriate manner, have a good chance of functional success, although, some mandibular movements can be compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18515045     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Belini Freire-Maia
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08-12

Review 2.  Condylar form alteration on skeletal class II patients that underwent orthognathic surgery: An overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Inês Francisco; Adriana Guimarães; Margarida Lopes; António Lucas; Francisco Caramelo; Francisco Vale
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-07-01

3.  Effect of perioperative buccal fracture of the proximal segment on postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Yoon Lee; Hoon Joo Yang; Jeong-Joon Han; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-22

4.  Three-dimensional evaluation of lingual split line after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in asymmetric prognathism.

Authors:  Jae Min Song; Yong Deok Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-25

Review 5.  Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative complications in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Jędrzejewski; T Smektała; K Sporniak-Tutak; R Olszewski
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Complications or rather side effects? Quantification of patient satisfaction and complications after orthognathic surgery-a retrospective, cross-sectional long-term analysis.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Daniel Schneider; Michael Hammel; Bassam Saka; Bernhard Frerich; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.