Literature DB >> 18514918

A short form of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ): the DAPP-SF.

Dirk van Kampen1, Edwin de Beurs, Helene Andrea.   

Abstract

A short form of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ), called the DAPP-SF, is presented, consisting of 136 of the original 290 items. It was established in a community sample that the factor structure of the DAPP-SF is highly congruent with the structure of the DAPP-BQ. The 18 DAPP-SF scales, which were found to be highly reliable, turned out to correlate substantially with the DAPP-BQ scales, even after applying a necessary correction, as the DAPP-SF was developed in the same sample used to investigate the Dutch DAPP-BQ. The higher-order convergent validity of the DAPP-SF was demonstrated by correlating the DAPP-SF scales and factors with Van Kampen's 5DPT. The same factor structure as found in the community sample of patients with personality disorder, also demonstrating that the agreement between the DAPP-SF and the DAPP-BQ is not dependent on the use of shared data. Finally, following Bagge and Trull [Bagge, C.L., Trull, T.J., 2003. DAPP-BQ: Factor structure and relations to personality disorder symptoms in a non-clinical sample. Journal of Personality Disorders 17, 19-32], specific predictions were tested concerning differences in means on the 18 scales between 10 diagnostic groups in the sample of patients with personality disorder. Results supported the validity of the DAPP-SF with respect to its lower-order structure. Finally, for practical purposes, preliminary norms are presented for females and males from the community in two different age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514918     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  5 in total

1.  Internet addiction and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of clinical research.

Authors:  Daria J Kuss; Olatz Lopez-Fernandez
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-22

2.  Prognostic Value of Pathological Personality Traits for Treatment Outcome in Anxiety and Depressive Disorders: The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study.

Authors:  Wessel A van Eeden; Albert M van Hemert; Erik J Giltay; Philip Spinhoven; Edwin de Beurs; Ingrid V E Carlier
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 1.899

3.  Personality and Psychopathology: a Theory-Based Revision of Eysenck's PEN Model.

Authors:  Dirk van Kampen
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2009-12-08

4.  Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study.

Authors:  Yvonne W M Schulte-van Maaren; Ingrid V E Carlier; Frans G Zitman; Albert M van Hemert; Margot W M de Waal; Martijn S van Noorden; Erik J Giltay
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Psychological Symptoms and Quality of Life After Simultaneous Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation.

Authors:  Michiel F Nijhoff; Jacqueline G F M Hovens; Sasja D Huisman; Jan Ringers; Ton A J Rabelink; Hans J W de Fijter; Paul J M van der Boog; Eelco J P de Koning
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-04-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.