Literature DB >> 18514745

Gender-specific strategy use and neural correlates in a spatial perspective taking task.

Stefan Kaiser1, Stephan Walther, Ernst Nennig, Klaus Kronmüller, Christoph Mundt, Matthias Weisbrod, Christoph Stippich, Kai Vogeley.   

Abstract

In the context of the present study spatial perspective taking refers to the ability to translocate one's own egocentric viewpoint to somebody else's viewpoint in space. We adopted a spatial perspective taking paradigm and performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study to assess gender differences of neural activity during perspective taking. 24 healthy subjects (12 male/12 female) were asked to systematically either take their own (first-person-perspective, 1PP) or another person's perspective (third-person-perspective, 3PP). Presented stimuli consisted of a virtual scenery with an avatar and red balls around him that had to be counted, if visible, from 1PP or 3PP. Reaction time was increased and correctness scores were decreased during the cognitively more effortful 3PP condition. Correctness scores showed a trend towards a more pronounced decline of performance during 3PP as compared to 1PP in female subjects. Female subjects correctness scores declined by 6.7% from 1PP to 3PP, while in male subjects this performance decline was only 2.7%. Debriefings after the experiment, reaction times depending on angle of rotation and error rates suggest that males are more likely to employ an object-based strategy in contrast to a consistently employed egocentric perspective transformation in females. In the whole group, neural activity was increased in the parieto-occipital, right inferior frontal and supplementary motor areas, confirming previous studies. With respect to gender, male subjects showed stronger activation in the precuneus and the right inferior frontal gyrus than female subjects in a region-of-interest approach. In a subgroup of male subjects whose strategy reports suggest object-based strategies these differences seem to be more pronounced. In conclusion, the differential recruitment of brain regions most likely reflects different strategies in solving this spatial perspective taking task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514745     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  15 in total

1.  Functional connectivity mapping of the human precuneus by resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Chiang-shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Investigation of mentalizing and visuospatial perspective taking for self and other in Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Nicole David; Carolin Aumann; Bettina H Bewernick; Natacha S Santos; Fritz-G Lehnhardt; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-09-10

3.  Mental rotational ability is correlated with spatial but not verbal working memory performance and P300 amplitude in males.

Authors:  Gregory J Christie; Charles M Cook; Brian J Ward; Matthew S Tata; Janice Sutherland; Robert J Sutherland; Deborah M Saucier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The relation between self-reported empathy and motor identification with imagined agents.

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Rocco Palumbo; Alberto Di Domenico; Barbara Penolazzi; Patrizia Garganese; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Men perform comparably to women in a perspective taking task after administration of intranasal oxytocin but not after placebo.

Authors:  Angeliki Theodoridou; Angela C Rowe; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Strategy modulates spatial perspective-taking: evidence for dissociable disembodied and embodied routes.

Authors:  Mark R Gardner; Mark Brazier; Caroline J Edmonds; Petra C Gronholm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Exploring empathic space: correlates of perspective transformation ability and biases in spatial attention.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Peter Brugger; Sohee Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Common brain areas engaged in false belief reasoning and visual perspective taking: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies.

Authors:  Matthias Schurz; Markus Aichhorn; Anna Martin; Josef Perner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The influence of visual perspective on the somatosensory steady-state response during pain observation.

Authors:  Dora L Canizales; Julien I A Voisin; Pierre-Emmanuel Michon; Marc-André Roy; Philip L Jackson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Do Gender-Specific and High-Resolution Three Dimensional Body Charts Facilitate the Communication of Pain for Women? A Quantitative and Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Line Lindhardt Egsgaard; Trine Søby Christensen; Ida Munk Petersen; Dorthe Scavenius Brønnum; Shellie Ann Boudreau
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2016-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.