Literature DB >> 18514525

Locomotor avoidance behaviours during a visually guided task involving an approaching object.

Michael E Cinelli1, Aftab E Patla.   

Abstract

Collision avoidance behaviours in situations where a collision may occur and one's planned movement is restricted, reveals that one's response is not as simple as a visual input producing some motor output. In this study, the participants (N=6) walked along a 9.5m path towards an air-filled human doll (180 degrees from their travel path) that would approach them on some trials. A spatial constraint (i.e. doorframe) was placed along the path and the participants had to determine if they could pass through the constraint prior to avoiding a collision or not. The constraint was set-up so that it was either at the theoretical collision point or 1.5m before or after the theoretical collision point. This study aimed to determine: (1) how the presence of a spatial constraint affects one's ability to perceive when to avoid a collision with an approaching object; (2) if the individuals use action parameters (i.e. velocity modifications, change in heading, etc.) in a consistent manner independent of the spatial constraint location and object's approach velocity; (3) if a consistent safety zone exists independent of the object's approach velocity. The results showed that the placement of the spatial constraint, but not the velocity of the object had a significant effect on the initiation of a change in heading. Participants used two-stage avoidance behaviour; change heading and then adjust walking velocity. The initial avoidance behaviour was initiated when the object was at a constant distance away (i.e. 3.73 m). Overall, it appears as though collision avoidance with approaching objects has cognitive as well as perceptual influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514525     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  4 in total

1.  Young and older adults use body-scaled information during a non-confined aperture crossing task.

Authors:  Amy L Hackney; Michael E Cinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cognitively Demanding Object Negotiation While Walking and Texting.

Authors:  Preeti Chopra; Darla M Castelli; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A Fully-Immersive Virtual Reality Setup to Study Gait Modulation.

Authors:  Chiara Palmisano; Peter Kullmann; Ibrahem Hanafi; Marta Verrecchia; Marc Erich Latoschik; Andrea Canessa; Martin Fischbach; Ioannis Ugo Isaias
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Adjustments of speed and path when avoiding collisions with another pedestrian.

Authors:  Markus Huber; Yi-Huang Su; Melanie Krüger; Katrin Faschian; Stefan Glasauer; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.