Literature DB >> 18514383

Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Alberto Briganti1, Umberto Capitanio, Felix K-H Chun, Andrea Gallina, Nazareno Suardi, Andrea Salonia, Luigi F Da Pozzo, Renzo Colombo, Valerio Di Girolamo, Roberto Bertini, Giorgio Guazzoni, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Francesco Montorsi, Patrizio Rigatti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous trials have shown that the number of procedures done by a single surgeon, that is, surgical volume (SV), is associated with several outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).
OBJECTIVE: To test the association between SV and the detection of lymph node metastases during extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort consisted of 1020 men surgically treated for clinically localized prostate cancer. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent RP and ePLND by a group of six surgeons who were trained by the surgeon with the highest SV. All surgeons performed an anatomically extended PLND, including removal of obturator, external iliac, and hypogastric nodes. MEASUREMENTS: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models tested the association between SV (either continuously coded or dichotomized according to the most informative cut-off, namely >144 vs < or =144 ePLNDs) and the rate of lymph node invasion (LNI) after accounting for preoperative (baseline prostate-specific antigen [PSA], clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum) and postoperative (pathologic stages and Gleason score, surgical margin status) patient characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean number of nodes removed was 19.1 (median, 16; range, 7-63). Mean overall SV was 227 (range, 87-379). Overall, LNI rate was 11.8% (120/1020). No significant differences were found among patients treated by the different surgeons in terms of clinical and pathologic characteristics (all p> or =0.06). Conversely, the surgeon with the highest SV removed more nodes and found more nodal metastases compared with the other surgeons (21.1 vs 17.9 mean number of nodes removed; p<0.001, and 15 vs 9.8% of LNI; p=0.01, respectively). At univariable logistic regression analysis, either continuously coded or dichotomized SV was a significant predictor of LNI (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively). In multivariable models, continuously coded as well as dichotomized SV maintained a significant association with the rate of LNI, after accounting for preoperative (p=0.04 and p=0.009, respectively) as well as for postoperative variables (p=0.03 and p=0.002, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for clinical and pathologic case-mix differences, patients treated by the highest-volume surgeons (>144 ePLNDs) were more likely to have LNI than those treated by low-volume surgeons, even though all surgeons used a similar extended template for node removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514383     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients. Clinical significance of extended lymphadenectomy].

Authors:  D K Osmonov; A Boller; A Aksenov; M Naumann; K P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Andrew Evans; John Srigley; Joseph L Chin; Bish Bora; Amber Hunter; Robin McLeod; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Validation and head-to-head comparison of three nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended and/or sentinel lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Esther Wit; Corinne Tillier; Erik van Muilekom; Floris Pos; Alexander Winter; Henk van der Poel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Management of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement: a rapidly evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Gilles Créhange; Chien Peter Chen; Charles C Hsu; Norbert Kased; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Mack Roach
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Clinical significance of pelvic lymph node status in prostate cancer: review of 1690 cases.

Authors:  Livia Maccio; Valeria Barresi; Federica Domati; Eugenio Martorana; Anna Maria Cesinaro; Mario Migaldi; Francesco Iachetta; Antonio Ieni; Luca Reggiani Bonetti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew H Feifer; Elena B Elkin; William T Lowrance; Brian Denton; Lindsay Jacks; David S Yee; Jonathan A Coleman; Vincent P Laudone; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of surgical volume on efficacy and complications in a single-surgeon series.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Pietro Grande; Johann Gregory Wirth; Hansjörg Danuser; Agostino Mattei
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; John B Eifler; Kipp Voth; Elias S Hyams; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Alan W Partin; Mohamad E Allaf; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Colon cancer lymph node evaluation among military health system beneficiaries: an analysis by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Abegail A Gill; Shelia H Zahm; Craig D Shriver; Alexander Stojadinovic; Katherine A McGlynn; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.