Literature DB >> 18514355

Eliciting preferences for resource allocation in mental health care in Ireland.

Eamon O'Shea1, Brenda Gannon, Brendan Kennelly.   

Abstract

The proportion of total health care expenditure devoted to mental health care in Ireland, at just below 7%, is low relative to other countries. There have been few studies that have examined the relationship between public preferences for different kinds of health care expenditure and priority setting as undertaken by policy-makers and governments. This paper examines citizen's rankings and willingness to pay for a community-based mental health care programme in Ireland relative to two other programmes: cancer and elderly care. Respondents rank cancer as the most important programme, followed by elderly care and then mental health care. The contingent valuation survey demonstrated that people are willing to make significant tax contributions to new community-based services for people with mental health problems, counteracting the view sometimes expressed that people do not care at all about mental health care provision. However, the survey also found that people tend to value additional spending on mental health care lower than cancer and elderly care programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514355     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

Review 1.  Stated and Revealed Preferences for Funding New High-Cost Cancer Drugs: A Critical Review of the Evidence from Patients, the Public and Payers.

Authors:  Tatjana E MacLeod; Anthony H Harris; Ajay Mahal
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  A study of the user's perception of economic value in nursing visits to primary care by the method of contingent valuation.

Authors:  Jesús Martín-Fernández; Francisco Javier Pérez-Rivas; Tomás Gómez-Gascón; Isabel del Cura-González; Eugenia Tello Bernabé; Gemma Rodríguez-Martínez; Elena Polentinos-Castro; Julia Domínguez-Bidagor; Gloria Ariza-Cardiel; Juan Francisco Conde-López; Milagros Beamud-Lagos; Oscar Aguado-Arroyo; Teresa Sanz-Bayona; Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alene Sze Jing Yong; Yi Heng Lim; Mark Wing Loong Cheong; Ednin Hamzah; Siew Li Teoh
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  Economic valuation of health care services in public health systems: a study about Willingness to Pay (WTP) for nursing consultations.

Authors:  Jesús Martín-Fernández; Ma Isabel del Cura-González; Gemma Rodríguez-Martínez; Gloria Ariza-Cardiel; Javier Zamora; Tomás Gómez-Gascón; Elena Polentinos-Castro; Francisco Javier Pérez-Rivas; Julia Domínguez-Bidagor; Milagros Beamud-Lagos; Ma Eugenia Tello-Bernabé; Juan Francisco Conde-López; Óscar Aguado-Arroyo; Ma Teresa Sanz-Bayona; Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Does the Public Prefer Health Gain for Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review of Public Views on Cancer and its Characteristics.

Authors:  Liz Morrell; Sarah Wordsworth; Sian Rees; Richard Barker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Is prevention of suicide worth less? A comparison of the value per statistical life.

Authors:  Vimefall Elin; Persson Mattias; Olofsson Sara; Hultkrantz Lars
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-08-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.