Literature DB >> 18514339

Additional PET/CT in week 5-6 of radiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer as a means of dose escalation planning?

Charles Gillham1, Daniel Zips, Falk Pönisch, Carsten Evers, Wolfgang Enghardt, Nasreddin Abolmaali, Klaus Zöphel, Steffen Appold, Tobias Hölscher, Jörg Steinbach, Jörg Kotzerke, Thomas Herrmann, Michael Baumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Loco-regional failure after radiotherapy with total doses of 60-70 Gy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a major clinical problem. Escalation of radiation dose is often limited because of exceeding normal tissue constraints. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that a reduction in disease volume during radiotherapy detected by FDG PET/CT would facilitate radiation dose escalation, whilst remaining within normal tissue constraints.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with localised inoperable NSCLC were prospectively enrolled. Each received standard 3D-conformally planned radiotherapy to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks. FDG PET/CT imaging in the treatment position was performed prior to treatment and repeated following 50 or 60 Gy. CT and PET-delineated gross tumour volumes were generated and a composite created. A margin of 15mm was added in all planes to form the planning target volume (PTV). Treatment planning was performed to compare two dose escalation strategies: 78 Gy delivered to the initial PTV with treatment in two phases (shrinking field), i.e., 66 Gy to the initial PTV with a 12 Gy-boost to the PTV after 50/60 Gy. As an alternative planning approach the maximal dose without exceeding normal tissue constraints was evaluated for each patient (individualized dose prescription).
RESULTS: There was a median PTV reduction after 50/60 Gy of 20%. Delivering 78 Gy to the initial PTV could have been achieved in 4/10 patients. Of the remaining 6, delivering 78 Gy to the initial PTV would have exceeded normal tissue constraints and no benefit was seen when delivered in two phases. The results from the individualized dose prescription indicated a higher median maximal dose when treatment would be given in two phases compared to one phase resulting in a modest increase of calculated tumour control probability.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that despite tumour shrinkage determined by subsequent FDG PET/CT during treatment the tested adaptive targeting strategy would result only in a modest improvement in the context of dose escalation. Further studies on the optimal use of FDG PET/CT and other approaches for dose escalation in loco-regionally advanced NSCLC are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514339     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  25 in total

Review 1.  Imaging radiation response in tumor and normal tissue.

Authors:  Marjan Rafat; Rehan Ali; Edward E Graves
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-15

2.  Potential for adaptive dose escalation in radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a low mid income setting.

Authors:  Sushma Agrawal; Sunil Kumar; Anil K Maurya
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Combining advanced radiotherapy technologies to maximize safety and tumor control probability in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Guckenberger; A Kavanagh; M Partridge
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Evaluation of adaptive treatment planning for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Salim M Siddiqui; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A geometric atlas to predict lung tumor shrinkage for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Pengpeng Zhang; Andreas Rimner; Ellen Yorke; Yu-Chi Hu; Licheng Kuo; Aditya Apte; Natalie Lockney; Andrew Jackson; Gig Mageras; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Individualization of cancer treatment from radiotherapy perspective.

Authors:  Ala Yaromina; Mechthild Krause; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Early CT and FDG-metabolic tumour volume changes show a significant correlation with survival in stage I-III small cell lung cancer: a hypothesis generating study.

Authors:  Judith van Loon; Claudia Offermann; Michel Ollers; Wouter van Elmpt; Erik Vegt; Ali Rahmy; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Philippe Lambin; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 8.  The use and misuse of positron emission tomography in lung cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Ching-Fei Chang; Afshin Rashtian; Michael K Gould
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.878

9.  Dose escalation for locally advanced lung cancer using adaptive radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated volume-adapted boost.

Authors:  Elisabeth Weiss; Mirek Fatyga; Yan Wu; Nesrin Dogan; Salim Balik; William Sleeman; Geoffrey Hugo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Adaptive radiation for lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Gomez; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.