Literature DB >> 18513836

Emergency vaccination of sheep against foot-and-mouth disease: significance and detection of subsequent sub-clinical infection.

S Parida1, L Fleming, Y Oh, M Mahapatra, P Hamblin, J Gloster, D J Paton.   

Abstract

This study has quantified the level of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) replication and shedding in vaccinated sheep and correlated this to the severity of clinical signs, the induction of antibodies against FMDV non-structural proteins (NSPs) and the transmission of virus to in-contact vaccinated sentinel sheep. To mimic an emergency vaccination regime in the field, sheep were vaccinated with O(1) Manisa vaccine and 4 or 10 days later were indirectly challenged with aerosols from O(1) UKG FMDV infected pigs. Vaccinated and control unvaccinated sheep were monitored for a minimum of 39 days post-challenge. The vaccinated sheep became sub-clinically infected, with reduced virus replication and excretion compared to unvaccinated and clinically infected sheep. Seroconversion to NSP was weak and transient in sheep in which virus replication was of low level and short duration. Virus transmission from vaccinated sub-clinically infected sheep to introduced vaccinated sentinels was not sufficient to cause NSP seroconversion or significant virus shedding. 10% of 10 days and 20% of 4 days vaccinated sheep were virus carriers at greater than 28 days post-challenge compared to 37.5% in the unvaccinated and clinically infected sheep. These results suggest that the low levels of virus replication likely if an effective vaccine is administered at least 4 days prior to challenge exposure are unlikely to result in the spread of infection even under intensive management conditions. Although it may be difficult to detect this infection by serosurveillance, the significance of missing it is likely to be low and the main value of such testing will be to detect undisclosed clinical infection resulting from lack of observation or from exposure to virus before or very soon after vaccination or from vaccine failure due to maladministration or inappropriate strain selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18513836     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  12 in total

1.  Modeling the spread and control of foot-and-mouth disease in Pennsylvania following its discovery and options for control.

Authors:  Michael J Tildesley; Gary Smith; Matt J Keeling
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Immune Response in Goats to Different Payloads of FMDV Monovalent Vaccine: Protection Against Virulent Challenge and Development of Carrier Status.

Authors:  M Madhanmohan; S B Nagendrakumar; P Santhakumar; D Thiagarajan; M Lakshmi Narasu; V A Srinivasan
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Protection against direct in-contact challenge following foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in sheep and goats: the effect on virus excretion and carrier status.

Authors:  Muthukrishnan Madhanmohan; Singanallur Balasubramanian Nagendrakumar; Villuppanoor Alwar Srinivasan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 4.  Options for control of foot-and-mouth disease: knowledge, capability and policy.

Authors:  David J Paton; Keith J Sumption; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Induction of a cross-reactive CD8(+) T cell response following foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccination.

Authors:  Efrain Guzman; Geraldine Taylor; Bryan Charleston; Shirley A Ellis
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Development of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies against the 3B protein of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Satya Parida; Tim Salo; Kate Hole; Lauro Velazquez-Salinas; Alfonso Clavijo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-02-04

7.  Vaccination of cattle only is sufficient to stop FMDV transmission in mixed populations of sheep and cattle.

Authors:  C Bravo DE Rueda; A Dekker; P L Eblé; M C M DE Jong
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 8.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Development and Validation of a Mucosal Antibody (IgA) Test to Identify Persistent Infection with Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus.

Authors:  Jitendra K Biswal; Antonello Di Nardo; Geraldine Taylor; David J Paton; Satya Parida
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Estimation of the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from infected sheep to cattle.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.