Literature DB >> 18513521

Predicting major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention: the Texas Heart Institute risk score.

Pankaj Madan1, MacArthur A Elayda, Vei-Vei Lee, James M Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many models have been devised in the past to predict adverse outcomes after PCI, but with rapid advancements in this field, a new risk-prediction model may be needed. The purpose of our study was to identify the clinical and angiographic variables associated with adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to construct a simple bedside tool for risk stratification of PCI patients.
METHODS: Using our institution's database, we analyzed data from 9,494 patients who underwent PCI between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2002 (ie, during the bare-metal stent era). Predictors of major adverse cardiac events--death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization by emergent coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI--were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis using baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables. A simple integer score was constructed by multiplying the beta coefficient for each variable by a constant and rounding the result to the nearest integer. The score was validated in 5,545 patients who underwent PCI between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2006 (ie, during the drug-eluting stent era).
RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis identified emergent procedure, urgent procedure, unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, hypertension, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, type C lesion, presence of thrombus, and number of stents placed as independent predictors of adverse events after PCI. The model had good overall discrimination (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.701), and the model fitted the validation cohort adequately.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk of complications after PCI can be assessed with this simple tool, which may permit comparisons between different operators as well as different hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18513521     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

Review 1.  Will stent revascularization replace coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

2.  Current Concepts in the Clinical Utility of Platelet Reactivity Testing.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Collet
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-08

3.  The burden of major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  I-Ting Tsai; Chao-Ping Wang; Yung-Chuan Lu; Wei-Chin Hung; Cheng-Ching Wu; Li-Fen Lu; Fu-Mei Chung; Chia-Chang Hsu; Yau-Jiunn Lee; Teng-Hung Yu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  The Burden of Short-term Major Adverse Cardiac Events and its Determinants after Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: A Prospective Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Rajesh Kumar; Jehangir A Shah; Bashir A Solangi; Ali Ammar; Mukesh Kumar; Naveedullah Khan; Jawaid A Sial; Tahir Saghir; Nadeem Qamar; Musa Karim
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-11

5.  Comparison of SYNTAX score strata effects of percutaneous and surgical revascularization trials: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Irbaz Hameed; Antonino Di Franco; Ajita Naik; Michelle Demetres; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.