Literature DB >> 18513122

Stimulus quality affects expression of the acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in mice.

C W Stoddart1, J Noonan, M T Martin-Iverson.   

Abstract

The relationship between stimulus intensity and startle response magnitude (SIRM) can assess the startle reflex and prepulse inhibition (PPI) with advantages over more commonly used methods. The current study used the SIRM relationships in mice to determine differences between white noise and pure tone (5 kHz) stimuli. Similarly to rats, the SIRM relationship showed a sigmoid pattern. The SIRM-derived reflex capacity (RMAX) and response efficacy (slope) of the white noise and pure tone stimuli in the absence of prepulses were equivalent. However, the pure tone startle response threshold (DMIN) was increased whereas the stimulus potency (1/ES50) was decreased when compared to white noise. Prepulses of both stimulus types inhibited RMAX and increased DMIN, but the white noise prepulses were more effective. Both stimulus intensity gating and motor capacity gating processes are shown to occur, dependent on prepulse intensity and stimulus onset asynchrony. Prepulse intensities greater than 10 dB below the startle threshold appear to produce PPI via stimulus intensity gating, whereas a motor capacity gating component appears at prepulse intensities near to the startle threshold. (Copyright) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18513122     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.122.3.516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  8 in total

1.  Alterations to pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) in chronic cannabis users are secondary to sustained attention deficits.

Authors:  Kirsty Elizabeth Scholes; Mathew Thomas Martin-Iverson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Corticosteroid dependent and independent effects of a cannabinoid agonist on core temperature, motor activity, and prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Avdesh Avdesh; Vincent Cornelisse; Mathew Thomas Martin-Iverson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  CB2 receptor agonism reverses MK-801-induced disruptions of prepulse inhibition in mice.

Authors:  Ramy Khella; Jennifer L Short; Daniel T Malone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Epigenetics and biomarkers in the staging of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Trevor Archer; Richard J Beninger; Tomas Palomo; Richard M Kostrzewa
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.911

5.  Regulation of fear responses by striatal and extrastriatal adenosine A2A receptors in forebrain.

Authors:  Catherine J Wei; Elisabete Augusto; Catarina A Gomes; Philipp Singer; Yumei Wang; Detlev Boison; Rodrigo A Cunha; Benjamin K Yee; Jiang-Fan Chen
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  Acoustic startle modification as a tool for evaluating auditory function of the mouse: Progress, pitfalls, and potential.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Derik Behrens; Georg Klump
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Repeated elicitation of the acoustic startle reflex leads to sensitisation in subsequent avoidance behaviour and induces fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas Götz; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  The startle reflex in echolocating odontocetes: basic physiology and practical implications.

Authors:  Thomas Götz; Aude F Pacini; Paul E Nachtigall; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.