Literature DB >> 18512698

Skull shape and feeding strategy in Sphenodon and other Rhynchocephalia (Diapsida: Lepidosauria).

Marc E H Jones1.   

Abstract

The Rhynchocephalia are a group of small diapsid reptiles that were globally distributed during the early Mesozoic. By contrast, the only extant representatives, Sphenodon punctatus and S. guntheri (Tuatara), are restricted to New Zealand off-shore islands. The Rhynchocephalia are widely considered to be morphologically uniform but research over the past 30 years has revealed unexpected phenotypic and taxonomic diversity. Phylogenetically "basal taxa" generally possess relatively simple conical or columnar teeth whereas more derived taxa possessed stouter flanged teeth and sophisticated shearing mechanisms: orthal in some (e.g., Clevosaurus hudsoni) and propalinal in others (e.g., S. punctatus). This variation in feeding apparatus suggests a wide range of feeding niches were exploited by rhynchocephalians. The relationship of skull shape to skull length, phylogenetic grouping, habit, and characters relating to the feeding apparatus are explored here with geometric morphometric analysis on two-dimensional landmarks. Principle components analysis demonstrates that there are significant differences between phylogenetic groups. In particular, Sphenodon differs significantly from all well known fossil taxa including the most phylogenetically basal forms. Therefore, it is not justifiable to use Sphenodon as a solitary outgroup when studying skull shape and feeding strategy in squamates; rhynchocephalian fossil taxa also need to be considered. There are also significant differences between the skull shapes of aquatic taxa and those of terrestrial taxa. Of the observed variation in skull shape, most variation is subsumed by variation in dentary tooth base shape, the type of jaw movement employed (e.g., orthal vs. propalinal) and the number of palatal tooth rows. By comparison, the presence or absence of flanges, dentary tooth number and palatal tooth row orientation subsume much less. Skull length was also found to be a poor descriptor of overall skull shape. Compared to basal rhynchocephalians members of more derived terrestrial radiations possess an enlarged postorbital area, a high parietal, and a jaw joint positioned ventral to the tooth row. Modification of these features is closely associated with increased biting performance and thus access to novel food items. Some of these same trends are apparent during Sphenodon ontogeny where skull growth is allometric and there is evidence for ontogenetic variation in diet. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18512698     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  23 in total

1.  Predicting muscle activation patterns from motion and anatomy: modelling the skull of Sphenodon (Diapsida: Rhynchocephalia).

Authors:  Neil Curtis; Marc E H Jones; Susan E Evans; JunFen Shi; Paul O'Higgins; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A sphenodontine (Rhynchocephalia) from the Miocene of New Zealand and palaeobiogeography of the tuatara (Sphenodon).

Authors:  Marc E H Jones; Alan J D Tennyson; Jennifer P Worthy; Susan E Evans; Trevor H Worthy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A new sphenodontian (Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia) from the Late Triassic of Argentina and the early origin of the herbivore opisthodontians.

Authors:  Ricardo N Martínez; Cecilia Apaldetti; Carina E Colombi; Angel Praderio; Eliana Fernandez; Paula Santi Malnis; Gustavo A Correa; Diego Abelin; Oscar Alcober
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Microanatomy and life history in Palaeopleurosaurus (Rhynchocephalia: Pleurosauridae) from the Early Jurassic of Germany.

Authors:  Nicole Klein; Torsten M Scheyer
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-12-22

5.  Biomechanical assessment of evolutionary changes in the lepidosaurian skull.

Authors:  Mehran Moazen; Neil Curtis; Paul O'Higgins; Susan E Evans; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The head and neck anatomy of sea turtles (Cryptodira: Chelonioidea) and skull shape in Testudines.

Authors:  Marc E H Jones; Ingmar Werneburg; Neil Curtis; Rod Penrose; Paul O'Higgins; Michael J Fagan; Susan E Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The good, the bad, and the ugly: the influence of skull reconstructions and intraspecific variability in studies of cranial morphometrics in theropods and Basal saurischians.

Authors:  Christian Foth; Oliver W M Rauhut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Functional relationship between skull form and feeding mechanics in Sphenodon, and implications for diapsid skull development.

Authors:  Neil Curtis; Marc E H Jones; Junfen Shi; Paul O'Higgins; Susan E Evans; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A new rhynchocephalian from the late jurassic of Germany with a dentition that is unique amongst tetrapods.

Authors:  Oliver W M Rauhut; Alexander M Heyng; Adriana López-Arbarello; Andreas Hecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The evolution of the lepidosaurian lower temporal bar: new perspectives from the Late Cretaceous of South China.

Authors:  Jin-You Mo; Xing Xu; Susan E Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.