| Literature DB >> 18512084 |
M P Uffen1, M R Krijnen, R J Hoogendoorn, G J Strijkers, V Everts, P I Wuisman, T H Smit.
Abstract
Nonunion is a major complication of spinal interbody fusion. Currently X-ray and computed tomography (CT) are used for evaluating the spinal fusion process. However, both imaging modalities have limitations in judgment of the early stages of this fusion process, as they only visualize mineralized bone. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be of great value as it is able to discriminate between different types of tissue. A feasibility study was performed in nine animals from a goat spinal fusion study, to evaluate the detection capacity of different tissues with micro-MRI. In this study bioresorbable polylactic acid cages were used. Six- and 12-months follow-up specimens were scanned in a 6.3 T micro-MRI scanner. After scanning, the specimens were processed for histology. Different types of tissue as well as the degradable cage material were identified in the fusion zone and designated as regions of interest (ROIs). Subsequently, the location of these ROIs was determined on the corresponding micro-MRI image, and average signal intensities of every individual ROI were measured. An excellent match was seen between the histological sections and micro-MRI images. The micro-MRI images showed quantifiable differences in signal intensity between bone with adipose marrow, bone with hematopoietic marrow, fibrocartilage, fibrous tissue, and degradable implant material. In time the signal intensity of bone with adipose marrow, bone with hematopoietic red marrow, and of fibrous tissue remained relatively constant. On the other hand, the signal intensity of the degradable implant material and the fibrocartilage changed significantly in time, indicating change of structure and composition. In conclusion, in our model using bioresorbable cages the MRI provides us with detailed information about the early fusion process and may therefore, allow early diagnosis of non-union.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18512084 PMCID: PMC2518760 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0689-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Spine J ISSN: 0940-6719 Impact factor: 3.134
Fig. 1a Micrograph of a toluidine blue stained specimen of a fused segment after 6 months. Encircled are several ROIs identifying different types of tissue involved in the spinal fusion. b The corresponding micro-MRI image. In the designated ROIs the average signal intensity was determined using image analysis software. Note the low signal intensity of the cage material, the deformation and the cracks
Abbreviations and definitions used for analyzed histological tissues
| Tissue | Abbreviation | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Bone with hematopoietic marrow | BHM | Presence of hematopoietic cells and osteocytesa |
| Bone with adipose marrow | BAM | Presence of adipose cells and osteocytesa |
| Fibrous tissue | F | Presence of fibroblasts and collagenous fibers |
| Fibrocartilage | FC | Presence of (rows of) chondrocytes |
| Cage material | C | Absence of cells |
aBone defined as tissue containing osteocytes, hematopoietic marrow defined as tissue containing hematopoietic cells, and adipose marrow defined as tissue containing adipose cells
Fig. 2The ratios of the different tissues analyzed in the present study (±SEM). The signal intensity of fibrous tissue is used as a standard (1 by definition). All other tissues are expressed as a ratio of fibrous tissue. Fibrocartilage and cage material signal intensities both changed during the follow-up. *p < 0.05 as compared between follow-up time-points (Student t test)
P-values of differences between different types of tissue and cage material at 6 months (vertical, bold italic), 12 months (horizontal, italic) and between follow-up time-points within selected tissues (bold)
| 12 months | 6 months | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | BAM | BHM | FC | C | |
| F |
|
|
|
|
|
| BAM |
|
|
|
|
|
| BHM |
|
|
|
|
|
| FC |
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
|
|
|
|
|
NS = not significant