Literature DB >> 18512046

ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

J J Brugts, C A Den Uil.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18512046      PMCID: PMC2517081          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1143-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.

Correspondence

With great interest, we read the article by Villar et al., who investigated the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphism in relationship to sepsis and acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) in over 300 Spanish patients. The authors did not find an association between this polymorphism and susceptibility, and outcome in either severe sepsis or ARDS [1]. In our opinion, the authors’ explanation for this lack of association is not sufficiently discussed and we hope to open the discussion on this topic by raising several issues. First, the authors correctly noted that ACE is an important enzyme involved in cardiovascular homeostasis [2]. We are disappointed that the authors investigated only one (non-functional) polymorphism in the ACE-gene. Instead of investigating one polymorphism, we would have preferred analysis of common variation in the complete ACE-gene, which would have been easy and feasible in such a relatively small population. This would have significantly strengthened any associations between ACE-genotypes and sepsis. In addition, it is good to realize that the ACE I/D polymorphism is only responsible for less than 20% variation of plasma ACE levels. It is hard to believe that such a single polymorphism accounts for a significant causal effect on endpoints such as sepsis and ARDS, which are probably syndromes that are highly influenced by microbial characteristics and polygenetic factors. Second, the authors reported a statistical power of 76–85% using a sample size of 212 septic and 120 ARDS patients. An adequate study size and statistical power are necessary to exclude false negative or positive association studies. An important review article in this field recently addressed that a number of 2,000 patients with sepsis would be required to detect a mortality relative risk of 1.5 from any polymorphism [3]. Third, the authors did not fully explain why the ACE I/D polymorphism could be important in sepsis, since individuals who have the DD-genotype usually have higher ACE levels relative to controls, whereas in septic ARDS patients markedly decreased plasma ACE levels have been observed [4, 5]. In this respect, it would have been nice if the authors would have correlated their findings to plasma ACE levels.
  5 in total

1.  Genetic variation and the assessment of risk in septic patients.

Authors:  Anthony F Suffredini; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  A systematic review of the quality of genetic association studies in human sepsis.

Authors:  Martin Fraser Clark; Simon Victor Baudouin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is not associated with susceptibility and outcome in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Jesús Villar; Carlos Flores; Lina Pérez-Méndez; Nicole Maca-Meyer; Elena Espinosa; Jesús Blanco; Ruben Sangüesa; Arturo Muriel; Paula Tejera; Mercedes Muros; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on endothelial injury and hemostasis in rabbit endotoxic shock.

Authors:  Eric Wiel; Qian Pu; Jérôme Leclerc; Delphine Corseaux; Régis Bordet; Niels Lund; Brigitte Jude; Benoît Vallet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Decreased serum angiotensin converting enzyme in adult respiratory distress syndrome associated with sepsis: a preliminary report.

Authors:  L Casey; B Krieger; J Kohler; C Rice; S Oparil; P Szidon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 7.598

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.