BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine how the effect of depressive symptoms on cognitive function is modified by church attendance. METHODS: We used a sample of 2759 older Mexican Americans. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline, 2, 5, 7, and 11 years of follow-up. Church attendance was dichotomized as frequent attendance (e.g., going to church at least once a month) versus infrequent attendance (e.g., never or several times a year). Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; score >or=16 vs <16). General linear mixed models with time-dependent covariates were used to explore cognitive change at follow-up. RESULTS: In unadjusted models, infrequent church attendees had a greater decline in MMSE scores (drop of 0.151 points more each year, standard error [SE] = 0.02, p <.001) compared to frequent church attendees; participants having CES-D scores >or=16 also had greater declines in MMSE scores (drop of 0.132 points more each year, SE = 0.03, p <.001) compared to participants with CES-D score <16 at follow-up. In fully adjusted models, a significant Church attendance x CES-D x Time interaction (p =.001) indicated that, among participants with CES-D scores >or=16, infrequent church attendees had greater decline in MMSE scores (drop of 0.236 points more each year, SE = 0.05, p <.001) compared to frequent church attendees at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Church attendance appears to be beneficial for maintaining cognitive function of older persons. Church attendance moderates the impact of clinically relevant depressive symptoms on subsequent cognitive function.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine how the effect of depressive symptoms on cognitive function is modified by church attendance. METHODS: We used a sample of 2759 older Mexican Americans. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline, 2, 5, 7, and 11 years of follow-up. Church attendance was dichotomized as frequent attendance (e.g., going to church at least once a month) versus infrequent attendance (e.g., never or several times a year). Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; score >or=16 vs <16). General linear mixed models with time-dependent covariates were used to explore cognitive change at follow-up. RESULTS: In unadjusted models, infrequent church attendees had a greater decline in MMSE scores (drop of 0.151 points more each year, standard error [SE] = 0.02, p <.001) compared to frequent church attendees; participants having CES-D scores >or=16 also had greater declines in MMSE scores (drop of 0.132 points more each year, SE = 0.03, p <.001) compared to participants with CES-D score <16 at follow-up. In fully adjusted models, a significant Church attendance x CES-D x Time interaction (p =.001) indicated that, among participants with CES-D scores >or=16, infrequent church attendees had greater decline in MMSE scores (drop of 0.236 points more each year, SE = 0.05, p <.001) compared to frequent church attendees at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Church attendance appears to be beneficial for maintaining cognitive function of older persons. Church attendance moderates the impact of clinically relevant depressive symptoms on subsequent cognitive function.
Authors: D F Swaab; E J G Dubelaar; M A Hofman; E J A Scherder; E J W van Someren; R W H Verwer Journal: Prog Brain Res Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.453
Authors: Joe Verghese; Richard B Lipton; Mindy J Katz; Charles B Hall; Carol A Derby; Gail Kuslansky; Anne F Ambrose; Martin Sliwinski; Herman Buschke Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M I Geerlings; R A Schoevers; A T Beekman; C Jonker; D J Deeg; B Schmand; H J Adèr; L M Bouter; W Van Tilburg Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Carlos F Mendes De Leon; Lisa L Barnes; Julie A Schneider; Julia L Bienias; Denis A Evans; David A Bennett Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ipsit V Vahia; Colin A Depp; Barton W Palmer; Ian Fellows; Shahrokh Golshan; Wesley Thompson; Matthew Allison; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Lesli E Skolarus; Lynda D Lisabeth; Brisa N Sánchez; Melinda A Smith; Nelda M Garcia; Jan M H Risser; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2012-12
Authors: Maria C Norton; Jeffrey Dew; Heeyoung Smith; Elizabeth Fauth; Kathleen W Piercy; John C S Breitner; JoAnn Tschanz; Heidi Wengreen; Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth A Corsentino; Nicole Collins; Natalie Sachs-Ericsson; Dan G Blazer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sally Moyce; Maria Velazquez; David Claudio; Sophia Thompson; Madeline Metcalf; Elizabeth Aghbashian; Karl Vanderwood; Nathaniel Sisson Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 2.772