OBJECTIVES: In response to growing concerns about sexual violence as an underrecognized traumatic consequence of military service, Veterans Health Administration policy requires universal screening for sexual trauma sustained during military service. This prospective study, the first to evaluate national efforts to screen for military sexual trauma, investigated whether sexual trauma screening is associated with increased utilization of mental health services. METHODS: This study examined data for all male (N=540,381) and female (N=33,259) veterans who had valid responses to screens for military sexual trauma in 2005. The use of mental health services during the three months after screening was examined for persons who screened positive for military sexual trauma and for those who screened negative. Findings were stratified by use of mental health services in the six months before the screening. RESULTS: Compared with negative screens, positive screens were associated with significantly increased rates of postscreen mental health treatment. A more than twofold increase was observed for patients without previous use of mental health treatment (women: relative risk [RR]=2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 2.38-2.66; men: RR=2.47, 95% CI=2.34-2.61). In this group, the number of positive screens needed for one additional patient to access treatment was 5.5 for women and 7.2 for men. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that detection via screening is associated with increased rates of mental health treatment. An effective screening program that promotes detection of sexual trauma and access to mental health care can help to reduce the burden of psychiatric illness for those who have experienced military sexual trauma.
OBJECTIVES: In response to growing concerns about sexual violence as an underrecognized traumatic consequence of military service, Veterans Health Administration policy requires universal screening for sexual trauma sustained during military service. This prospective study, the first to evaluate national efforts to screen for military sexual trauma, investigated whether sexual trauma screening is associated with increased utilization of mental health services. METHODS: This study examined data for all male (N=540,381) and female (N=33,259) veterans who had valid responses to screens for military sexual trauma in 2005. The use of mental health services during the three months after screening was examined for persons who screened positive for military sexual trauma and for those who screened negative. Findings were stratified by use of mental health services in the six months before the screening. RESULTS: Compared with negative screens, positive screens were associated with significantly increased rates of postscreen mental health treatment. A more than twofold increase was observed for patients without previous use of mental health treatment (women: relative risk [RR]=2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 2.38-2.66; men: RR=2.47, 95% CI=2.34-2.61). In this group, the number of positive screens needed for one additional patient to access treatment was 5.5 for women and 7.2 for men. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that detection via screening is associated with increased rates of mental health treatment. An effective screening program that promotes detection of sexual trauma and access to mental health care can help to reduce the burden of psychiatric illness for those who have experienced military sexual trauma.
Authors: Katherine M Iverson; Katie A McLaughlin; Megan R Gerber; Alexandra Dick; Brian N Smith; Margret E Bell; Natasha Cook; Karen S Mitchell Journal: Psychol Violence Date: 2013-07
Authors: Amanda K Gilmore; Margaret T Davis; Anouk Grubaugh; Heidi Resnick; Anna Birks; Carol Denier; Wendy Muzzy; Peter Tuerk; Ron Acierno Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Patrick S Calhoun; Amie R Schry; Paul A Dennis; H Ryan Wagner; Nathan A Kimbrel; Lori A Bastian; Jean C Beckham; Harold Kudler; Kristy Straits-Tröster Journal: J Interpers Violence Date: 2016-01-21
Authors: Kathryn K Carroll; Ashton M Lofgreen; Darian C Weaver; Philip Held; Brian J Klassen; Dale L Smith; Niranjan S Karnik; Mark H Pollack; Alyson K Zalta Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Kristin M Mattocks; Anne Sadler; Elizabeth M Yano; Erin E Krebs; Laurie Zephyrin; Cynthia Brandt; Rachel Kimerling; Theo Sandfort; Melissa E Dichter; Jeffrey J Weiss; Jeroan Allison; Sally Haskell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Patricia Hayes; Steven Wright; Paula P Schnurr; Linda Lipson; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Donna L Washington Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.128