Literature DB >> 18510513

Image processing techniques to quantify microprojections on outer corneal epithelial cells.

Gemma Julio1, Ma Dolores Merindano, Marc Canals, Miquel Ralló.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that cellular microprojections (microvilli and/or microplicae) of the corneal surface are essential to maintain the functionality of the tissue. To date, the characterization of these vital structures has been made by analysing scanning or transmission electron microscopy images of the cornea by methods that are intrinsically subjective and imprecise (qualitative or semiquantitative methods). In the present study, numerical data concerning three microprojection features were obtained by an automated method and analysed to establish which of them showed less variability. We propose that the most stable microprojection characteristic would be a useful sign in early detection of epithelial damage or disease. With this aim, the scanning electron microscopy images of 220 corneal epithelial cells of nine rabbits were subjected to several image processing techniques to quantify microprojection density, microprojection average size and surface covered by microprojections (SCM). We then assessed the reliability of the methods used and performed a statistical analysis of the data. Our results show that the thresholding process, the basis of all image processing techniques used in this work, is highly reliable in separating microprojections from the rest of the cell membrane. Assessment of histogram information from thresholded images is a good method to quantify SCM. Amongst the three studied variables, SCM was the most stable (with a coefficient of variation of 15.24%), as 89.09% of the sample cells had SCM values > or = 40%. We also found that the variability of SCM was mainly due to intercellular differences (the cell factor contribution represented 88.78% of the total variation in the analysed cell areas). Further studies are required to elucidate how healthy corneas maintain high SCM values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18510513      PMCID: PMC2423409          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00898.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  19 in total

1.  A comparative SEM study of the vertebrate corneal epithelium.

Authors:  S P Collin; H B Collin
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 2.  Epithelial mucins of the ocular surface: structure, biosynthesis and function.

Authors:  P Argüeso; I K Gipson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 3.  Distribution of mucins at the ocular surface.

Authors:  Ilene K Gipson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  The normal surface of corneal epithelium: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  R R Pfister
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-09

5.  A comparative study of corneal epithelial cell surfaces utilizing the scanning electron microscope.

Authors:  C V Harding; M Bagchi; A Weinsieder; V Peters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-12

6.  The precorneal tear film. I. Factors in spreading and maintaining a continuous tear film over the corneal surface.

Authors:  M A Lemp; F J Holly; S Iwata; C H Dohlman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-01

7.  The stereo ultrastructure of the external and internal surface of the cornea.

Authors:  S Blümcke; K Morgenroth
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1967-06

8.  Impact of brief exposure to balanced salts solution or cetylpyridinium chloride on the surface appearance of the rabbit corneal epithelium--a scanning electron microscopy study.

Authors:  Michael J Doughty
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.424

9.  MUC16 mucin is expressed by the human ocular surface epithelia and carries the H185 carbohydrate epitope.

Authors:  Pablo Argüeso; Sandra Spurr-Michaud; Cindy L Russo; Ann Tisdale; Ilene K Gipson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Changes in the tear film and ocular surface from dry eye syndrome.

Authors:  Michael E Johnson; Paul J Murphy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  4 in total

1.  Duodenum Intestine-Chip for preclinical drug assessment in a human relevant model.

Authors:  Magdalena Kasendra; Raymond Luc; Jianyi Yin; Dimitris V Manatakis; Gauri Kulkarni; Carolina Lucchesi; Josiah Sliz; Athanasia Apostolou; Laxmi Sunuwar; Jenifer Obrigewitch; Kyung-Jin Jang; Geraldine A Hamilton; Mark Donowitz; Katia Karalis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Visualizing cellular and tissue ultrastructure using Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy (TREx).

Authors:  Hugo G J Damstra; Boaz Mohar; Mark Eddison; Anna Akhmanova; Lukas C Kapitein; Paul W Tillberg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Quantification of acute vocal fold epithelial surface damage with increasing time and magnitude doses of vibration exposure.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kojima; Mark Van Deusen; W Gray Jerome; C Gaelyn Garrett; M Preeti Sivasankar; Carolyn K Novaleski; Bernard Rousseau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reduced Mrp2 surface availability as PI3Kγ-mediated hepatocytic dysfunction reflecting a hallmark of cholestasis in sepsis.

Authors:  David Hertz; Eric Seemann; Anne J Beer; Martina Beretta; Martin Westermann; Reinhard Bauer; Michael Bauer; Michael M Kessels; Britta Qualmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.