Literature DB >> 18510356

Phosphoprotein profiling by PA-GeLC-MS/MS.

Kolbrun Kristjansdottir1, Donald Wolfgeher, Nick Lucius, David Sigfredo Angulo, Stephen J Kron.   

Abstract

A significant consequence of protein phosphorylation is to alter protein-protein interactions, leading to dynamic regulation of the components of protein complexes that direct many core biological processes. Recent proteomic studies have populated databases with extensive compilations of cellular phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites and a similarly deep coverage of the subunit compositions and interactions in multiprotein complexes. However, considerably less data are available on the dynamics of phosphorylation, composition of multiprotein complexes or that define their interdependence. We describe a method to identify candidate phosphoprotein complexes by combining phosphoprotein affinity chromatography, separation by size, denaturing gel electrophoresis, protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry, and informatics analysis. Toward developing phosphoproteome profiling, we have isolated native phosphoproteins using a phosphoprotein affinity matrix, Pro-Q Diamond resin (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen). This resin quantitatively retains phosphoproteins and associated proteins from cell extracts. Pro-Q Diamond purification of a yeast whole cell extract followed by 1-D PAGE separation, proteolysis and ESI LC-MS/MS, a method we term PA-GeLC-MS/MS, yielded 108 proteins, a majority of which were known phosphoproteins. To identify proteins that were purified as parts of phosphoprotein complexes, the Pro-Q eluate was separated into two fractions by size, <100 kDa and >100 kDa, before analysis by PAGE and ESI LC-MS/MS and the component proteins queried against databases to identify protein-protein interactions. The <100 kDa fraction was enriched in phosphoproteins indicating the presence of monomeric phosphoproteins. The >100 kDa fraction contained 171 proteins of 20-80 kDa, nearly all of which participate in known protein-protein interactions. Of these 171, few are known phosphoproteins, consistent with their purification by participation in protein complexes. By comparing the results of our phosphoprotein profiling with the informational databases on phosphoproteomics, protein-protein interactions and protein complexes, we have developed an approach to examining the correlation between protein interactions and protein phosphorylation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18510356      PMCID: PMC2694672          DOI: 10.1021/pr700816k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  65 in total

1.  Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome.

Authors:  Y Oda; T Nagasu; B T Chait
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis.

Authors:  D Voges; P Zwickl; W Baumeister
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  Analysis of phosphorylated proteins and peptides by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  D T McLachlin; B T Chait
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome.

Authors:  Bernd Bodenmiller; Lukas N Mueller; Markus Mueller; Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-02-11       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Mass spectrometry-based functional proteomics: from molecular machines to protein networks.

Authors:  Thomas Köcher; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of alpha-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xue Li; Scott A Gerber; Adam D Rudner; Sean A Beausoleil; Wilhelm Haas; Judit Villén; Joshua E Elias; Steve P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nevan J Krogan; Gerard Cagney; Haiyuan Yu; Gouqing Zhong; Xinghua Guo; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Joyce Li; Shuye Pu; Nira Datta; Aaron P Tikuisis; Thanuja Punna; José M Peregrín-Alvarez; Michael Shales; Xin Zhang; Michael Davey; Mark D Robinson; Alberto Paccanaro; James E Bray; Anthony Sheung; Bryan Beattie; Dawn P Richards; Veronica Canadien; Atanas Lalev; Frank Mena; Peter Wong; Andrei Starostine; Myra M Canete; James Vlasblom; Samuel Wu; Chris Orsi; Sean R Collins; Shamanta Chandran; Robin Haw; Jennifer J Rilstone; Kiran Gandi; Natalie J Thompson; Gabe Musso; Peter St Onge; Shaun Ghanny; Mandy H Y Lam; Gareth Butland; Amin M Altaf-Ul; Shigehiko Kanaya; Ali Shilatifard; Erin O'Shea; Jonathan S Weissman; C James Ingles; Timothy R Hughes; John Parkinson; Mark Gerstein; Shoshana J Wodak; Andrew Emili; Jack F Greenblatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage.

Authors:  Shuhei Matsuoka; Bryan A Ballif; Agata Smogorzewska; E Robert McDonald; Kristen E Hurov; Ji Luo; Corey E Bakalarski; Zhenming Zhao; Nicole Solimini; Yaniv Lerenthal; Yosef Shiloh; Steven P Gygi; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  pI-based phosphopeptide enrichment combined with nanoESI-MS.

Authors:  Chien-Wen Hung; Dieter Kübler; Wolf D Lehmann
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Abraxas and RAP80 form a BRCA1 protein complex required for the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Shuhei Matsuoka; Bryan A Ballif; Dong Zhang; Agata Smogorzewska; Steven P Gygi; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Protein Mobility Shifts Contribute to Gel Electrophoresis Liquid Chromatography Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Carruthers; Graham C Parker; Theresa Gratsch; Joseph A Caruso; Paul M Stemmer
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2015-09

2.  Comparison of in-gel protein separation techniques commonly used for fractionation in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling.

Authors:  Mohieddin Jafari; Vincent Primo; Gary B Smejkal; Eugene V Moskovets; Winston P Kuo; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Annotator: postprocessing software for generating function-based signatures from quantitative mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Juliesta E Sylvester; Tyler S Bray; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  SAP155-mediated splicing of FUSE-binding protein-interacting repressor serves as a molecular switch for c-myc gene expression.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Matsushita; Toshiko Kajiwara; Mai Tamura; Mamoru Satoh; Nobuko Tanaka; Takeshi Tomonaga; Hisahiro Matsubara; Hideaki Shimada; Rei Yoshimoto; Akihiro Ito; Shuji Kubo; Tohru Natsume; David Levens; Minoru Yoshida; Fumio Nomura
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  Yeast proteomics and protein microarrays.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Michael Snyder
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Alternative splicing of FBP-interacting repressor coordinates c-Myc, P27Kip1/cyclinE and Ku86/XRCC5 expression as a molecular sensor for bleomycin-induced DNA damage pathway.

Authors:  Bahityar Rahmutulla; Kazuyuki Matsushita; Mamoru Satoh; Masanori Seimiya; Sachio Tsuchida; Shuji Kubo; Hideaki Shimada; Masayuki Ohtsuka; Masaru Miyazaki; Fumio Nomura
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.