Literature DB >> 18509121

A placebo-controlled trial of prucalopride for severe chronic constipation.

Michael Camilleri1, René Kerstens, An Rykx, Lieve Vandeplassche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this 12-week trial, we aimed to determine the efficacy of prucalopride, a selective, high-affinity 5-hydroxytryptamine4 receptor agonist, in patients with severe chronic constipation.
METHODS: In our multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, patients with severe chronic constipation (< or =2 spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week) received placebo or 2 or 4 mg of prucalopride, once daily, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients having three or more spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week, averaged over 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy end points were derived from daily diaries and validated questionnaires completed by patients. Adverse events, clinical laboratory values, and cardiovascular effects were monitored.
RESULTS: Efficacy was analyzed in 620 patients. The proportion of patients with three or more spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week was 30.9% of those receiving 2 mg of prucalopride and 28.4% of those receiving 4 mg of prucalopride, as compared with 12.0% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Over 12 weeks, 47.3% of patients receiving 2 mg of prucalopride and 46.6% of those receiving 4 mg of prucalopride had an increase in the number of spontaneous, complete bowel movements of one or more per week, on average, as compared with 25.8% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). All other secondary efficacy end points, including patients' satisfaction with their bowel function and treatment and their perception of the severity of their constipation symptoms, were significantly improved with the use of 2 or 4 mg of prucalopride as compared with placebo, at week 12. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were headache and abdominal pain. There were no significant cardiovascular effects of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Over 12 weeks, prucalopride significantly improved bowel function and reduced the severity of symptoms in patients with severe chronic constipation. Larger and longer trials are required to further assess the risks and benefits of the use of prucalopride for chronic constipation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00483886 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509121     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  177 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the management of difficult constipation.

Authors:  Brian E Lacy; John Levenick; Michael Crowell
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-08

2.  Irritable bowel syndrome--the main recommendations.

Authors:  Viola Andresen; Jutta Keller; Christian Pehl; Michael Schemann; Jan Preiss; Peter Layer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Estimating the relationship between preference-based generic utility instruments and disease-specific quality-of-life measures in severe chronic constipation: challenges in practice.

Authors:  Mark Parker; Alan Haycox; Jane Graves
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  New treatment options for chronic constipation: mechanisms, efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Michael Camilleri
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Tegaserod in the treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Authors:  Peter Wood
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Serotonin receptor diversity in the human colon: Expression of serotonin type 3 receptor subunits 5-HT3C, 5-HT3D, and 5-HT3E.

Authors:  Johannes Kapeller; Dorothee Möller; Felix Lasitschka; Frank Autschbach; Ruud Hovius; Gudrun Rappold; Michael Brüss; Michael D Gershon; Beate Niesler
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Inability of the Rome III criteria to distinguish functional constipation from constipation-subtype irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Reuben K Wong; Olafur S Palsson; Marsha J Turner; Rona L Levy; Andrew D Feld; Michael von Korff; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Clinical utility of colonic manometry in slow transit constipation.

Authors:  S Singh; S Heady; E Coss-Adame; S S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  New treatments for irritable bowel syndrome in women.

Authors:  Mopelola A Adeyemo; Lin Chang
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2008-11

Review 10.  Chronic Constipation.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Arnold Wald
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.