Literature DB >> 18509112

Reactivation-dependent amnesia for appetitive memories is determined by the contingency of stimulus presentation.

Jonathan L C Lee1, Barry J Everitt.   

Abstract

Previously acquired aversive and appetitive memories are not stable and permanent. The reactivation of such memories by re-exposure to training stimuli renders them vulnerable to disruption by amnestic agents such as the noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-SH-dibenzo{a,d}cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801). However, relatively little is known about the parameters that influence the reactivation process. Here, we show that the method of stimulus presentation during memory reactivation is of great importance. Male Lister Hooded rats were trained to acquire a lever press response that delivered a sucrose reward paired with a light conditioned stimulus (CS). The CS-sucrose association was then reactivated through re-exposure to the CS, either contingently upon the lever press response, or noncontingently in the absence of instrumental responding. Systemic administration of MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) at the time of memory reactivation resulted in amnesia, and hence a reduction in subsequent sucrose seeking induced by, and dependent upon, presentation of the CS, only when the memory was reactivated contingently. Therefore, stimuli may have to be presented in the same manner at memory reactivation as during learning in order to render a previously acquired memory vulnerable to disruption. These results have important implications for the potential translational use of glutamatergic treatments in conjunction with targeted memory reactivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509112     DOI: 10.1101/lm.976108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reconsolidation of drug memories.

Authors:  Barbara A Sorg
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Behavioural memory reconsolidation of food and fear memories.

Authors:  Charlotte R Flavell; David J Barber; Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  The effect of propranolol and midazolam on the reconsolidation of a morphine place preference in chronically treated rats.

Authors:  Michael J F Robinson; Michael Armson; Keith B J Franklin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Reduction in Responding for Sucrose and Cocaine Reinforcement by Disruption of Memory Reconsolidation

Authors:  Marc T J Exton-McGuinness; Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2015-03-30

Review 5.  Memory reconsolidation in aversive and appetitive settings.

Authors:  Amy C Reichelt; Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 6.  Mechanisms governing the reactivation-dependent destabilization of memories and their role in extinction.

Authors:  Charlotte R Flavell; Elliot A Lambert; Boyer D Winters; Timothy W Bredy
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.558

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.