Literature DB >> 18507891

Costs, quality of life, treatment satisfaction and compliance in patients with beta-thalassemia major undergoing iron chelation therapy: the ITHACA study.

Luciana Scalone1, Lorenzo G Mantovani, Marieke Krol, Diana Rofail, Simona Ravera, Maria Grazia Bisconte, Caterina Borgna-Pignatti, Zelia Borsellino, Paolo Cianciulli, Domenico Gallisai, Luciano Prossomariti, Ippazio Stefàno, Maria D Cappellini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Iron chelation treatment (ICT) in beta-thalassemia major (beta-TM) patients undergoing blood transfusions can cause low satisfaction, low compliance, with possible negative consequences on treatment success, patients' wellbeing, and costs. The purpose was to estimate the societal burden attributable to beta-TM in terms of direct and indirect costs, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), satisfaction and compliance with ICT in patients undergoing transfusions and ICT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The naturalistic, multicenter, longitudinal Italian-THAlassemia-Cost-&-Outcomes-Assessment (ITHACA) cost-of-illness study was conducted involving patients of any age, on ICT for at least 3 years, who were enrolled at 8 Italian Thalassemia Care Centers. Costs were estimated from the societal perspective, quantified with tariffs, prices, or net earnings valid in 2006.
RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled (median age = 28.3, 3-48 years, 49.6% male) and retrospectively observed for a median of 11.6 months. Mean direct costs were euro1242/patient/month, 55.5% attributable to ICT, 33.2% attributable to transfusions. Relevant quantity and quality of productivity was lost. Both physical and mental components of HRQoL were compromised. Little difficulties remembering to take ICT and positive satisfaction with the perceived effectiveness of therapy were declared, but not good levels of satisfaction with acceptance, perception of side effects and burden of ICT.
CONCLUSIONS: The management of beta-TM patients undergoing transfusions and ICT is efficacious, although costly, but overall benefits were not always perceived as optimal by patients. Efforts must be focused to improve patients' acceptance and satisfaction with their therapy; this would contribute to a better compliance and hence an increase in treatment effectiveness and patients' overall wellbeing, with expected improved allocation of human and economic resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18507891     DOI: 10.1185/03007990802160834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  29 in total

1.  Relationship among chelator adherence, change in chelators, and quality of life in thalassemia.

Authors:  Felicia L Trachtenberg; Eric Gerstenberger; Yan Xu; Lauren Mednick; Amy Sobota; Hannah Ware; Alexis A Thompson; Ellis J Neufeld; Robert Yamashita
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Three Iron Chelators Used in Monotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Iron Overload in β-Thalassaemia Major Patients: An Italian Perspective.

Authors:  Alessia Pepe; Giuseppe Rossi; Anthony Bentley; Maria Caterina Putti; Ludovica Frizziero; Domenico Giuseppe D'Ascola; Liana Cuccia; Anna Spasiano; Aldo Filosa; Vincenzo Caruso; Aishah Hanif; Antonella Meloni
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  ATG vs thiotepa with busulfan and cyclophosphamide in matched-related bone marrow transplantation for thalassemia.

Authors:  Lawrence Faulkner; Cornelio Uderzo; Sadaf Khalid; Priya Marwah; Rajpreet Soni; Naila Yaqub; Samina Amanat; Itrat Fatima; Sarah Khan Gilani; Tatheer Zahra; Stalin Ramprakash; Lallindra Gooneratne; Ruwangi Dissanayake; Senani Williams; Wasantha Rathnayake; Reshma Srinivas; Amit Sedai; Ankita Kumari; Lailith Parmar; Rakesh Dhanya; Rajat Kumar Agarwal
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-05-11

4.  Pain as an emergent issue in thalassemia.

Authors:  Felicia Trachtenberg; Dru Foote; Marie Martin; Susan Carson; Thomas Coates; Owen Beams; Olivia Vega; Manuela Merelles-Pulcini; Patricia J Giardina; Dorothy A Kleinert; Janet Kwiatkowski; Alexis A Thompson; Ellis J Neufeld; Leann Schilling; Vivek Thayalasuthan; Zahra Pakbaz; Robert Yamashita
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 10.047

5.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia major and sickle cell disease: indications and management recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Emanuele Angelucci; Susanne Matthes-Martin; Donatella Baronciani; Françoise Bernaudin; Sonia Bonanomi; Maria Domenica Cappellini; Jean-Hugues Dalle; Paolo Di Bartolomeo; Cristina Díaz de Heredia; Roswitha Dickerhoff; Claudio Giardini; Eliane Gluckman; Ayad Achmed Hussein; Naynesh Kamani; Milen Minkov; Franco Locatelli; Vanderson Rocha; Petr Sedlacek; Frans Smiers; Isabelle Thuret; Isaac Yaniv; Marina Cavazzana; Christina Peters
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating iron overload in patients with β-thalassaemia, sickle cell disease and myelodysplastic syndromes in the US: a literature review.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Prina Z Donga; Mitra Corral; Medha Sasane; Jeffrey D Miller; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Transfusion support for haemoglobinopathies.

Authors:  T J Greenwalt; K R Zelenski
Journal:  Clin Haematol       Date:  1984-02

8.  Psychometric properties of the Specific Thalassemia Quality of Life Instrument for adults.

Authors:  Georgios N Lyrakos; Demetra Vini; Helen Aslani; Marouso Drosou-Servou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Socio-demographic Profile and Economic Burden of Treatment of Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia.

Authors:  Amita Moirangthem; Shubha R Phadke
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 10.  Assessment and treatment of pain in thalassemia.

Authors:  Ashutosh Lal
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.