| Literature DB >> 18507860 |
Véronique Ouellet1, Magdalena Zietarska, Lise Portelance, Julie Lafontaine, Jason Madore, Marie-Line Puiffe, Suzanna L Arcand, Zhen Shen, Josée Hébert, Patricia N Tonin, Diane M Provencher, Anne-Marie Mes-Masson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell lines constitute a powerful model to study cancer, and here we describe three new epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cell lines derived from poorly differentiated serous solid tumors (TOV-1946, and TOV-2223G), as well as the matched ascites for one case (OV-1946).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18507860 PMCID: PMC2467432 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient clinical data
| Patient | ||
| Clinical Parameter | 1946 | 2223 |
| Age at diagnosis | 75 | 89 |
| Tumor type | cystadenocarcinoma | cystadenocarcinoma |
| Histopathology sub-type | serous papillary | serous papillary |
| Tumor grade | G3 | G3 |
| Disease stage | IIIC | IIIC |
| Ascitis at surgery | Yes | yes |
| Surgical debulking | Sub-optimal | Sub-optimal |
| Progression | N/A | yes |
| Death | yes* | yes |
| Cause of death | gastric hemorrhage | disease progression |
| Follow up (months) | 0.5 | 18 |
| Treatment | N/A | Megace (palliative care only) |
N/A = not applicable
*patient died from post-operative complication
Figure 1Cellular morphology of serous ovarian epithelium cancer cell lines and their corresponding tumoral tissues. A, C, E) Morphological appearance of the TOV-1946, OV-1946 and TOV-2223 cell lines respectively at passage 0. More (TOV-1946 and TOV-2223) or less (OV-1946) heterogenous populations of cells with obvious fibroblastic contaminants are visible for all three cell lines. B,D,F) Appearance of TOV-1946, OV-1946 and TOV-2223 cell lines respectively at passage 70. An evolution toward a more homogenous population of cobblestone-like cells typical of an epithelial cell type. G,H) Hematoxylin-Eosin stained tumor tissue sections of patient 1946 and 2223. Poorly differentiated tumor masses can be observed. All primary cultures and cell lines were cultured in OSE medium composed of 50:50 medium 199:105 (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B and 50 μg/mL gentamicin. All photographs were taken at 400× magnification.
Figure 2Solid tumor and cell line expression of keratins, TP53 and HER2. A-D) Immunohistochemistry on paraffin embedded TOV-1946 tumor tissue verifying Krt7, Krt20, Her2 and p53 expression respectively. E-H) Expression of the same four proteins was verified in the TOV-2223 tumoral tissue. Krt7 and Krt20 were used to distinguish between ovarian and gastro-intestinal tract tumors. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin and all sections were observed by light microscopy at 400× magnification. I) In parallel, Her2, p53, Krt7, Krt18 and Krt8 expression was verified by western blot in cell lines. Krt7, Krt18 were used in order to confirm the epithelial character of cell lines. Actin was used as a loading control.
Summary of cell line growth characteristics and tumorigenicity
| Cell line growth assays | TOV-1946 | OV-1946 | TOV-2223 | TOV-112D | |
| Growth characteristic | Doubling time (days) +/- S.D.a | 1.3 +/- 0.4 | 2.5 +/- 0.9 | 2.6 +/- 0.7 | 1.0 +/- 0.2 |
| Saturation density (nb cells +/- S.D.)b | 3 053 933 +/- 153 933 | 3 231 400 +/- 962 723 | 2 536 867 +/-680 852 | 6 162133 +/- 515 034 | |
| Number of passages to date | >210 | >210 | >150 | >200 | |
| Spheroid | Formation | aggregate | semi-compact | no | compact |
| Migration | time for wound filling (h) | 24 | 48 | >48 | 48 |
| Invasion | Mean number of cells +/- S.D.c | 417 +/- 226 | 149 +/- 70 | 257 +/- 79 | 118 +/- 34 |
| Soft agarose | Colony number +/- S.D.d | 11 +/- 3 | 24 +/- 8 | 16 +/- 4 | 27 +/- 10 |
| Colony size | large | large | small | large | |
| Low serum | Capacity to grow in low serum (1%) conditions | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Subcutaneous injection in SCID mice | Number of mice with tumors (n = 6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mean time of tumor appearance (days) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 7 | |
| Intraperitoneal injection in SCID mice | Number of mice with tumors (n = 6) | 3 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Mean time of tumor appearance (days) | 125 | 63 | N/A | 18 | |
| Number of mice with ascitis | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
N/A not applicable
acalculated according to the slope of the linear portion of the growth curve.
brepresents the mean of maximum number of cells counted among the two independent experiments performed in triplicatat
cnumber of cells that migrate through the matrigel insert
dmean of colony numbers per representative area (minimum 5) from two independent experiment performed in duplicate
Figure 3Cell growth rate and tumorigenicity assays. A) Growth curves of the three new cell lines as well as a previously characterized EOC TOV-112D cell line. 100 000 cells were plated onto 60 mm petri dishes. Cells were trypsinised and counted every 48 h for two weeks. Experiments were performed two times in triplicate. B) Wound-healing assay of the same four cell lines. Cells were plated onto a 12 well dish and at near confluence wounds were generated. Cells were methanol fixed and treated with Giemsa Stain at different time points in order to evaluate cell migration (0 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h after the scratch was performed). The experiments were performed twice in triplicate. C) Invasion assay using modified Boyden chambers. The capability of the cells to invade through matrigel membranes was verified and the invasion potential increased from TOV-112D, OV-1946, TOV-2223 to TOV-1946. The experiments were performed in duplicate. D) The capacity of the cells to form three-dimensional structures in hanging droplets was monitored. TOV-112D cells were able to form very compact spheroids, OV-1946 formed less compact spheroids, TOV-1946 cells formed loose aggregates of cells and TOV-2223 cells were unable to form any 3-D structure. Spheroid formation capability was visualized after four days.
Mutations status of the new EOC cell lines
| Gene tested | TOV112D | TOV-1946 | OV-1946 | TOV-2223G |
| EX5-36 G>A, R175H | EX8+35 C>T, R273C | EX8+35 C>T, R273C | EX4+62 G>A, W53X | |
| - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | |
| Microsatellite Instablility (MSI) | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | |
- = no mutations were found
G-banding composite karyotypes of the three ovarian cancer cell lines
| Cell line | G-banding composite karyotypes |
| TOV-2223 | 53~71, X, der(X)t(X;2)(q13;q2?3), +der(1)t(1;17)(p3?4;q21), +add(1)(p?21), +add(1)(p12),?i(2)(q10), der(2)t(2;5)(q31;q31), +der(3)t(3;22)(q2?2;q11.2), del(3)(q23), +4, +4, -5, +5, der(6;12)(q10;q10), +add(6)(p11.2), +7, del(8)(p11.2)x2, +del(8)(p21), +9, der(10)t(5;10)(q?31;q26), +11, +add(12)(q11), +add(12)(p11.2), +add(12)(q24), +der(12;14)(p10;q10), add(13)(p11.2), +i(13)(q10), add(14)(p11.2), -15, -15, der(15)add(15)(p11.2)add(15)(q26), add(16)(q22), +add(16)(q22), -17, -17, -18, add(18)(p11.2), del(19)(p13), add(19)(q13), -20, add(21)(p11.2), -22, i(22)(q10), +20mar, inc [cp25] |
| TOV-1946 | 51~62, X, -X, der(X;12)(q10;q10), del(1)(q41q42), +add(1)(p13), +del(1)(q12), add(2)(q37), t(3;6)(p21;p21), t(3;6)(p21;p21)x2, del(3)(p?14), add(4)(q35), del(5)(p12), +der(5;8)(q10;p10), der(6)t(3;6)(p10;q10)del(6)(q?21), +der(6)add(6)(p25)add(6)(q27), del(7)(q11.2q21), +add(7)(p11.2), add(8)(p11.2), +der(8)?t(8;12)(p12;q13), +9, +del(9)(p21), +der(9)del(9) (p13)add(9)(q32), +10, add(11)(p15)x2, +del(11)(p11.2), del(12)(p11.2)x2, der(13)?t(11;13)(p11.2;p11.2)x2, add(15)(p11.2)x2, + der(15)?t(8;15)(q21;p11.2), -16, add(16)(p13), add(16)(q24), -17, add(17)(p11.2), add(17)(p1?3), add(18)(q23), +19, +add(19)(q13.4), +20, +20, -21, -22,+22,+?22,+20mar,inc[cp22] |
| OV-1946 | 57~65, X, -X, der(X;12)(q10;q10), del(1)(q41q42), add(1)(p13), +add(1)(p13), +del(1)(q12), -2, der(2)del(2)(p?14)add(2)(q?31), t(3;6)(p21;p21), del(3)(p?14), +5, +del(5)(q11.2), +7, +add(7)(q11.2), +8, +add(8)(p11.2), +der(8)?t(8;12)(p12;q13), del(9)(p21), add(9)(q32), +add(9)(q32), +der(9)del(9)(p13)add(9)(q32), +10, +add(10)(q26), add(11)(p15)x2, +del(11)(p11.2), del(12)(p11.2), der(13)?t(11;13)(p11.2;p11.2)x2, add(15)(p11.2)x2, +der(15)?t(8;15)(q21;p11.2), add(16)(p13), -17, -17, add(17)(p11.2), add(17)(p1?3), +del(17)(p11.2), -18, +18, +19, +19, +20, +20, -21, +22, +?22, +26mar, inc [cp19] |
Figure 4A) Representative G-banded metaphases from the TOV-2223 (cell 10) cell line. Arrows indicate the abnormal chromosomes, mar: marker chromosome. B) Representative metaphases from TOV-2223 (cell 45) analyzed by SKY. The origin of several marker chromosomes (mar) is defined by SKY analysis. Other examples of G-banded metaphases and the combined inverted-DAPI and SKY images of different cells are presented (see additional Files 1 and 2).
Figure 5A) Representative G-banded metaphases from the TOV-1946 (cell 34) cell lines. Arrows indicate the abnormal chromosomes, mar: marker chromosome. B), D), F) Representative metaphases from TOV-1946 (cell 44) cell line analyzed by SKY. The origin of several marker chromosomes (mar) is defined by SKY analysis. Other examples of G-banded metaphases and the combined inverted-DAPI and SKY images of different cells are presented (see additional Files 3 and 4).
Figure 6A) Representative G-banded metaphases from the OV-1946 (cell 1) cell line. Arrows indicate the abnormal chromosomes, mar: marker chromosome. B) Representative metaphases from OV-1946 (cell 11) cell line analyzed by SKY. The origin of several marker chromosomes (mar) is defined by SKY analysis. Other examples of G-banded metaphases and the combined inverted-DAPI and SKY images of different cells are presented (see additional Files 5).