C-W Liou1, T-Y Tan, T-K Lin, P-W Wang, H-K Yip. 1. Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. cwliou@ms22.hinet.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although a clear protocol for reduction of recurrent ischaemic stroke (RIS) has been established, few studies have compared the stroke subtype distribution and risk factors between RIS and first-ever stroke (FES). METHODS: This one-year hospital-based study enrolled 587 FES and 475 RIS patients. Patients were categorized into four stroke subtypes according to a modified TOAST stroke subtype classification system. Risk factor profiles were compared between the two major stroke groups and between the corresponding four subtypes to discriminate the significant risk factors for RIS. RESULTS: A multivariate regression analysis identified hypertension (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.34-2.62), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.22-2.02), low high-density lipoprotein (LHDL) (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.08-1.88) and older age as significant RIS risk factors. The significance of the former three RIS factors was further recognized in its large-vessel subtype. Moreover, metabolic syndrome was significantly more common in the recurrent stroke group (P = 0.01), including its large-vessel subtype (P = 0.04). Progressively increasing odds ratios from 1.49 to 2.02, in accordance with increased number of diagnostic components of metabolic syndrome for recurrent large-vessel ischaemic stroke, were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome likely plays a crucial role in the development of RIS, including large-vessel infarction in modern-day Taiwan.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although a clear protocol for reduction of recurrent ischaemic stroke (RIS) has been established, few studies have compared the stroke subtype distribution and risk factors between RIS and first-ever stroke (FES). METHODS: This one-year hospital-based study enrolled 587 FES and 475 RIS patients. Patients were categorized into four stroke subtypes according to a modified TOAST stroke subtype classification system. Risk factor profiles were compared between the two major stroke groups and between the corresponding four subtypes to discriminate the significant risk factors for RIS. RESULTS: A multivariate regression analysis identified hypertension (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.34-2.62), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.22-2.02), low high-density lipoprotein (LHDL) (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.08-1.88) and older age as significant RIS risk factors. The significance of the former three RIS factors was further recognized in its large-vessel subtype. Moreover, metabolic syndrome was significantly more common in the recurrent stroke group (P = 0.01), including its large-vessel subtype (P = 0.04). Progressively increasing odds ratios from 1.49 to 2.02, in accordance with increased number of diagnostic components of metabolic syndrome for recurrent large-vessel ischaemic stroke, were noted. CONCLUSIONS:Metabolic syndrome likely plays a crucial role in the development of RIS, including large-vessel infarction in modern-day Taiwan.
Authors: Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Gordon Gubitz; Nicholas Giacomantonio; Howard Wightman; David Marsters; Kara Thompson; Chris Blanchard; Gail Eskes; Marianne Thornton Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 2.474