Literature DB >> 18506670

Predictors of breast cancer-related distress following mammography screening in younger women on a family history breast screening programme.

K Brain1, B J Henderson, S Tyndel, C Bankhead, E Watson, A Clements, J Austoker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This longitudinal study investigated pre-screening factors that predicted breast cancer-specific distress among 1286 women who were undergoing annual mammography screening as part of a UK programme for younger women (i.e., under 50) with a family history of breast cancer.
METHODS: Women completed questionnaires one month prior to screening, and one and six months after receiving screening results. Factors measured were breast cancer worry, perceived risk, cognitive appraisals, coping, dispositional optimism, and background variables relating to screening history and family history.
RESULTS: Pre-screening cancer worry was the most important predictor of subsequent worry, explaining 56/61% and 54/57% of the variance at one and six months follow-up, respectively. Other salient pre-screening predictors included high perceived risk of breast cancer, appraisals of high relevance and threat associated with the family history, and low perceived ability to cope emotionally. Women who had previously been part of the screening programme and those with a relative who had recently died from breast cancer were also vulnerable to longer-term distress. A false positive screening result, pessimistic personality, and coping efforts relating to religion and substance use predicted outcomes of screening at one month follow-up, but were not predictive in the longer-term.
CONCLUSION: Early intervention to ameliorate high levels of cancer-related distress and negative appraisals would benefit some women as they progress through the familial breast screening programme. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18506670     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  6 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer risk counselling and screening: impact on perceived risk and psychological functioning.

Authors:  Christine Maheu; Andrea Vodermaier; Heidi Rothenmund; Steve Gallinger; Paola Ardiles; Kara Semotiuk; Spring Holter; Saumea Thayalan; Mary Jane Esplen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  A model of the influence of false-positive mammography screening results on subsequent screening.

Authors:  Jessica T Defrank; Noel Brewer
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2010

3.  Living my family's story: identifying the lived experience in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Robin M Lally; Marc T Kiviniemi; Christine Murekeyisoni; Suzanne S Dickerson
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Pre-Procedural Anxiety and Associated Factors Among Women Seeking for Cervical Cancer Screening Services in Shenzhen, China: Does Past Screening Experience Matter?

Authors:  Wei Lin; Weikang Huang; Chaofan Mei; Chuyan Zhong; Leilei Zhu; Peiyi Liu; Shixin Yuan; Zhihua Liu; Yueyun Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  The psychological impact and experience of breast cancer screening in young women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Rebekah Kwa; Sarah Ephraums; Mathilda Wilding; Lavvina Thiyagarajan; Jane Fleming; Katrina Moore; Yemima Berman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.446

6.  Mammographic surveillance in women aged 35-39 at enhanced familial risk of breast cancer (FH02).

Authors:  D G Evans; S Thomas; J Caunt; L Roberts; A Howell; M Wilson; R Fox; D M Sibbering; S Moss; M G Wallis; D M Eccles; S Duffy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.