| Literature DB >> 18506145 |
J Shrout1, M Yousefzadeh, A Dodd, K Kirven, C Blum, A Graham, K Benjamin, R Hoda, M Krishna, M Romano, M Wallace, E Garrett-Mayer, M Mitas.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common non-cutaneous malignancy in the United States and the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death. One of the most important determinants of CRC survival is lymph node metastasis. To determine whether molecular markers might be prognostic for lymph node metastases, we measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR the expression levels of 15 cancer-associated genes in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tissues derived from stage I-IV CRC patients with (n=20) and without (n=18) nodal metastases. Using the mean of the 15 genes as an internal reference control, we observed that low expression of beta(2)microglobulin (B2M) was a strong prognostic indicator of lymph node metastases (area under the curve (AUC)=0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.69-0.94). We also observed that the expression ratio of B2M/Spint2 had the highest prognostic accuracy (AUC=0.87; 95% CI=0.71-0.96) of all potential two-gene combinations. Expression values of Spint2 correlated with the mean of the entire gene set at an R(2) value of 0.97, providing evidence that Spint2 serves not as an independent prognostic gene, but rather as a reliable reference control gene. These studies are the first to demonstrate a prognostic role of B2M at the mRNA level and suggest that low B2M expression levels might be useful for identifying patients with lymph node metastasis and/or poor survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18506145 PMCID: PMC2441949 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Primers used for real-time RT–PCR
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| AGR2 | NM_006408 | GCAGAGCAGTTTGTCCTCCTCA | 76 |
|
| |||
| B2M | NM_004048 | GCCGTGTGAACCATGTGACTTT | 97 |
|
| |||
| CDH1 | NM_004360 | CCCACCACGTACAAGGGTC | 94 |
|
| |||
| CDH3 | NM_001793 | ATCATCGTGACCGACCAGAAT | 166 |
|
| |||
| CEA6 | NM_002483 | AGATTGCATGTCCCCTGGAA | 104 |
|
| |||
| CK19 | NM_002276 | AACGGCGAGCTAGAGGTGA | 204 |
|
| |||
| Claudin7 | NM_001307 | TGGCCATCAGATTGTCACAGAC | 88 |
|
| |||
| Elf3 | NM_004433 | TCTTCCCCAGCGATGGTTTT | 124 |
|
| |||
| EpCAM1 | NM_002354 | CGCAGCTCAGGAAGAATGTG | 88 |
|
| |||
| EpCAM2 | NM_002353 | ACCCGAGGAGAAGAGGAGTTTG | 100 |
|
| |||
| GPX2 | NM_002083 | GGACATCAGGAGAACTGTCAGA | 150 |
|
| |||
| MAL2 | NM_052886 | GTCTGCCTGGAGATTCTGTTCG | 103 |
|
| |||
| MAP7 | NM_003980 | AGGACAAAGAACGCCACGAA | 87 |
|
| |||
| S100P | NM_005980 | GACGTCTTTCCCGATATTCGG | 127 |
|
| |||
| Spint2 | NM_021102 | GTGCCTCAAGAAATGTGCCACT | 81 |
|
|
RT–PCR=reverse transcription–PCR.
Gene-specific primer sequences used for cDNA synthesis are underlined.
Diagnostic accuracies of cancer-associated genes for detection of metastatic disease in lymph nodes derived from CRC patients
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Map7 | 0.980 | 0.734–1.000 |
| AGR2 | 0.939 | 0.674–0.987 |
| MAL2 | 0.939 | 0.674–0.987 |
| EpCAM2 | 0.939 | 0.674–0.987 |
| EpCAM1 | 0.939 | 0.674–0.987 |
| CEA6 | 0.918 | 0.647–0.988 |
| CDH1 | 0.918 | 0.647–0.988 |
| S100P | 0.837 | 0.548–0.972 |
| ELF3 | 0.837 | 0.548–0.972 |
| Sprint2 | 0.816 | 0.525–0.964 |
| Claudin7 | 0.816 | 0.525–0.964 |
| GPX2 | 0.714 | 0.419–0.914 |
| CDH3 | 0.694 | 0.399–0.903 |
| CK19 | 0.531 | 0.255–0.792 |
AUC=area under the curve; CRC=colorectal cancer; CI=confidence interval.
Figure 1Real-time RT–PCR analysis of metastatic and benign lymph nodes from colon cancer patients. Real-time PCR analyses of seven benign lymph nodes (left side of each matched data set; open triangles) and seven metastatic lymph nodes (right side of each matched data set; closed diamonds) were performed as described in Materials and Methods using primer pairs for the indicated genes. Ct values for each gene were determined from triplicate reactions. ΔCt values were obtained by subtracting the mean Ct value of B2M (which is highly expressed in normal lymph node tissue) from the mean Ct value for each respective gene. Note: The mean B2M Ct value of the metastatic lymph nodes was slightly lower (i.e. B2M gene expression was slightly higher) but not significantly different from that of benign tissue (17.8±2.1 vs 20.2±2.1, respectively).
Patient information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 12/20 (60%) | 0.52 | 14/20 (70%) | 0.03 |
| Female | 8/18 (44%) | 6/18 (33%) | |||
| Site | Right colon | 11/24 (46%) | 0.63 | 11/24 (46%) | 0.63 |
| Left colon | 2/2 (100%) | 2/2 (100%) | |||
| Rectum | 4/7 (57%) | 4/7 (57%) | |||
| Sigmoid | 2/3 (67%) | 2/3 (67%) | |||
| Left colon+rectum | 1/1 (100%) | 1/1 (100%) | |||
| transverse | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) | |||
| Type | Adeno | 15/30 (50%) | 0.70 | 17/30 | 0.44 |
| Adeno, mucinous | 5/8 (63%) | 3/8 | |||
| Differentiation | Well | 3/10 (30%) | 0.13 | 6/10 (60%) | 0.82 |
| Well to moderate | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) | |||
| Moderate | 14/24 (58%) | 13/24 (54%) | |||
| Moderate to poor | 2/2 (100%) | 1/2 (50%) | |||
| Poor | 1/1 (100%) | 0/1 (0%) | |||
| Continuous | 0.03 | 0.52 | |||
| T-stage | 1 | 0/2 (0%) | 0.001 | 0/2 (0%) | 0.20 |
| 2 | 2/12 (17%) | 5/12 (42%) | |||
| 3 | 17/23 (74%) | 14/23 (61%) | |||
| 4 | 1/1 (100%) | 1/1 (100%) | |||
| Continuous | <0.001 | 0.05 | |||
| Path stage | I | 0/12 (0%) | <0.001 | 3/12 (25%) | <0.001 |
| IIA | 0/6 (0%) | 0/6 (0%) | |||
| IIIA | 5/5 (100%) | 3/5 (60%) | |||
| IIIB | 2/2 (100%) | 2/2 (100%) | |||
| IIIC | 7/7 (100%) | 6/7 (86%) | |||
| IV | 6/6 (100%) | 6/6 (100%) |
LN+=lymph node positive.
Low B2M-expressing sample was defined by Ct mean 15-gene set−Ct >4.5.
Figure 2Real-time PCR analyses of FFPE primary tissue from CRC patients. Real-time RT–PCR was performed on patients who did (n=18; right side of each matched data set; filled circles) and who did not have (n=18; left side of each matched data set; open circles) metastatic lymph nodes from CRC as described in Materials and Methods using primer pairs for the indicated genes. Ct values for each gene were determined from triplicate reactions.
Prognostic accuracies of single genes for lymph node metastases using the 15-gene set as an internal reference
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| B2M | 0.846 | 0.692–0.942 |
| GPX2 | 0.792 | 0.629–0.906 |
| Claudin7 | 0.717 | 0.547–0.850 |
| S100P | 0.669 | 0.498–0.813 |
| AGR2 | 0.665 | 0.494–0.810 |
| Map7 | 0.653 | 0.481–0.799 |
| EpCAM1 | 0.650 | 0.478–0.797 |
| CK19 | 0.647 | 0.476–0.795 |
| CDH1 | 0.632 | 0.460–0.782 |
| CDH3 | 0.606 | 0.434–0.760 |
| EpCAM2 | 0.601 | 0.430–0.756 |
| MAL2 | 0.565 | 0.395–0.725 |
| ELF3 | 0.565 | 0.395–0.725 |
| Sprint2 | 0.546 | 0.377–0.708 |
| CEA6 | 0.528 | 0.360–0.691 |
AUC=area under the curve; CI=confidence interval.
Area under the curve values were obtained using the mean Ct value of the patient sample as an internal reference.
Figure 3Spint2 expression levels are highly correlated with the mean of the 15-gene set. Mean Ct values of the 15 genes were obtained by dividing the sum of the Ct values by 15. In cases where no signal was detected, a Ct value of 40 was used. Linear regression analysis of the indicated data points was performed using Microsoft Excel software.