Roland Schweizer1, David D Martin, Eckhard Schönau, Michael B Ranke. 1. Pediatric Endocrinology Section, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Hoppe Seyler Strasse 1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany. Roland.Schweizer@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Short small for gestational age (SGA) children can be affected by a lack of muscle mass rather than fat mass. They also face a high risk of the metabolic syndrome developing after childhood. It is not known whether low muscle mass influences muscle function. AIM: Our aim was to investigate muscle-fat distribution and muscle function before and during GH treatment in short SGA children. PATIENTS: A total of 34 prepubertal short SGA children (11 females, seven with Silver-Russell syndrome) were included in the study. Mean values were: age at GH start 7.3 yr; height sd score (SDS) -3.3; and birth weight SDS -2.7. METHODS: Investigations over 24 months on GH treatment (57 microg/kg.d) were performed. Body composition, including fat area and muscle area (MA), was assessed through peripheral quantitative computed tomography (XCT 2000; Stratec, Inc., Pforzheim, Germany). Maximal isometric grip force was performed with a Jamar dynamometer (Preston, Jackson, MI). Comparison with height-dependent reference values (SDS(Height)) was calculated. RESULTS: MA SDS(Height) at GH start was -1.8 and increased to -0.8 (P < 0.001) and -0.8, and fat area SDS(Height) decreased from -0.6 to -2.0 (P < 0.001) and -1.5 after 12 and 24 months on GH. Maximal isometric grip force SDS(Height) increased from -0.9 to 0.3 (P < 0.001) and 0.5. MA at start correlated negatively with height velocity (R = -0.54; P < 0.001) and MA SDS at start and Delta-height SDS during the first year of GH treatment (R = -0.40; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Short stature in SGA children is associated with low muscle mass and function. Supraphysiological GH doses led to a concomitant increment in height, muscle mass, and function, whereas fat mass decreased. Furthermore, body composition at GH start gives insight into GH responsiveness and the individual risk of metabolic syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Short small for gestational age (SGA) children can be affected by a lack of muscle mass rather than fat mass. They also face a high risk of the metabolic syndrome developing after childhood. It is not known whether low muscle mass influences muscle function. AIM: Our aim was to investigate muscle-fat distribution and muscle function before and during GH treatment in short SGA children. PATIENTS: A total of 34 prepubertal short SGA children (11 females, seven with Silver-Russell syndrome) were included in the study. Mean values were: age at GH start 7.3 yr; height sd score (SDS) -3.3; and birth weight SDS -2.7. METHODS: Investigations over 24 months on GH treatment (57 microg/kg.d) were performed. Body composition, including fat area and muscle area (MA), was assessed through peripheral quantitative computed tomography (XCT 2000; Stratec, Inc., Pforzheim, Germany). Maximal isometric grip force was performed with a Jamar dynamometer (Preston, Jackson, MI). Comparison with height-dependent reference values (SDS(Height)) was calculated. RESULTS: MA SDS(Height) at GH start was -1.8 and increased to -0.8 (P < 0.001) and -0.8, and fat area SDS(Height) decreased from -0.6 to -2.0 (P < 0.001) and -1.5 after 12 and 24 months on GH. Maximal isometric grip force SDS(Height) increased from -0.9 to 0.3 (P < 0.001) and 0.5. MA at start correlated negatively with height velocity (R = -0.54; P < 0.001) and MA SDS at start and Delta-height SDS during the first year of GH treatment (R = -0.40; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Short stature in SGA children is associated with low muscle mass and function. Supraphysiological GH doses led to a concomitant increment in height, muscle mass, and function, whereas fat mass decreased. Furthermore, body composition at GH start gives insight into GH responsiveness and the individual risk of metabolic syndrome.
Authors: Emma L Wakeling; Frédéric Brioude; Oluwakemi Lokulo-Sodipe; Susan M O'Connell; Jennifer Salem; Jet Bliek; Ana P M Canton; Krystyna H Chrzanowska; Justin H Davies; Renuka P Dias; Béatrice Dubern; Miriam Elbracht; Eloise Giabicani; Adda Grimberg; Karen Grønskov; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Alexander A Jorge; Masayo Kagami; Agnes Linglart; Mohamad Maghnie; Klaus Mohnike; David Monk; Gudrun E Moore; Philip G Murray; Tsutomu Ogata; Isabelle Oliver Petit; Silvia Russo; Edith Said; Meropi Toumba; Zeynep Tümer; Gerhard Binder; Thomas Eggermann; Madeleine D Harbison; I Karen Temple; Deborah J G Mackay; Irène Netchine Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Lynda E Polgreen; William Thomas; Paul J Orchard; Chester B Whitley; Bradley S Miller Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Ralph Decker; Anders Nygren; Berit Kriström; Andreas Fm Nierop; Jan Gustafsson; Kerstin Albertsson-Wikland; Jovanna Dahlgren Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 2.763