OBJECTIVE: Several studies have assessed the acute antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and many have revealed positive results. However, the impact of rTMS throughout the long course of major depressive disorder (MDD) and the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of depressive relapses still remain to be elucidated. METHOD: Sixteen medication-free patients with refractory MDD (diagnosed according to DSM-IV) who initially had clinically significant antidepressant responses to a 10-day course of 10-Hz rTMS were consecutively admitted to the protocol from 1997 to 2001 and were followed for 4 years. The cohort was studied during a total of 64 episodes of depressive relapse. Severity of depression was evaluated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) prior to and after completion of each rTMS treatment course. Clinically significant response was defined as a reduction in HAM-D score of at least 50%. Safety was assessed by serial neurologic examinations and neuropsychological evaluations. RESULTS: Approximately one half of the patients individually sustained a clinically significant response to the repeated courses of rTMS; the mean +/- SD decrease in HAM-D scores was 64.8% +/- 12.6% (p < .0001), and, in BDI scores, 60.4% +/- 20.6% (p < .0001). Despite the lack of adjuvant antidepressant medication, the mean interval between treatment courses was approximately 5 months, and the medication-free period ranged from 26 to 43 months. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was well tolerated, and evaluations regarding the safety of the repeated applications of rTMS revealed no findings of concern. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated rTMS applications have demonstrated a reproducible antidepressant effect in patients with refractory depression who initially showed a clinically significant benefit. The duration of effect varied across patients, but benefits were sustained for a mean of nearly 5 months. Further studies with larger cohorts will be useful in determining the long-term effectiveness of rTMS maintenance therapy.
OBJECTIVE: Several studies have assessed the acute antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and many have revealed positive results. However, the impact of rTMS throughout the long course of major depressive disorder (MDD) and the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of depressive relapses still remain to be elucidated. METHOD: Sixteen medication-free patients with refractory MDD (diagnosed according to DSM-IV) who initially had clinically significant antidepressant responses to a 10-day course of 10-Hz rTMS were consecutively admitted to the protocol from 1997 to 2001 and were followed for 4 years. The cohort was studied during a total of 64 episodes of depressive relapse. Severity of depression was evaluated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) prior to and after completion of each rTMS treatment course. Clinically significant response was defined as a reduction in HAM-D score of at least 50%. Safety was assessed by serial neurologic examinations and neuropsychological evaluations. RESULTS: Approximately one half of the patients individually sustained a clinically significant response to the repeated courses of rTMS; the mean +/- SD decrease in HAM-D scores was 64.8% +/- 12.6% (p < .0001), and, in BDI scores, 60.4% +/- 20.6% (p < .0001). Despite the lack of adjuvant antidepressant medication, the mean interval between treatment courses was approximately 5 months, and the medication-free period ranged from 26 to 43 months. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was well tolerated, and evaluations regarding the safety of the repeated applications of rTMS revealed no findings of concern. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated rTMS applications have demonstrated a reproducible antidepressant effect in patients with refractory depression who initially showed a clinically significant benefit. The duration of effect varied across patients, but benefits were sustained for a mean of nearly 5 months. Further studies with larger cohorts will be useful in determining the long-term effectiveness of rTMS maintenance therapy.
Authors: Michael S Kelly; Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Margo Bernstein; Adam P Stern; Daniel Z Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Aaron D Boes Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: Antonio Mantovani; Martina Pavlicova; David Avery; Ziad Nahas; William M McDonald; Chandra D Wajdik; Paul E Holtzheimer; Mark S George; Harold A Sackeim; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Kyle P Fitzgibbon; Donna Plett; Brian C F Chan; Rebecca Hancock-Howard; Peter C Coyte; Daniel M Blumberger Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: M Mennemeier; T Munn; M Allensworth; J K Lenow; G Brown; S Allen; J Dornhoffer; D K Williams Journal: Hear Res Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Chandra Wajdik; Keith H Claypoole; Walid Fawaz; Paul E Holtzheimer; John Neumaier; David L Dunner; David R Haynor; Peter Roy-Byrne; David H Avery Journal: J ECT Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.635