Literature DB >> 18505214

Buonocore Lecture. Placing dental composites--a stressful experience.

Jack L Ferracane1.   

Abstract

The setting of dental composites is accompanied by significant polymerization contraction, resulting in the generation of stresses within the material and at the tooth-restoration interface. These stresses can have a deleterious effect on marginal integrity if they exceed the adhesive strength of the restorative, as well as on the properties of the composite. It has been determined that several factors affect these stresses, including the polymerization rate of the composite, its formulation, including filler and monomer composition and the constraints imposed by the geometry of the cavity preparation. Many strategies have been developed to reduce the effect of these stresses. Changes in the formulation of the composite have included experimentation with a variety of stress relieving additives, modified catalyst compositions and alternative monomer systems. Modifications to the placement techniques have included the use of incremental curing, altered light activation schemes and resilient liners. This manuscript will review many of the important scientific and clinical issues relating to the generation and quantitation of the stresses produced in dental composites during curing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18505214     DOI: 10.2341/07-BL2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  44 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials.

Authors:  N B Cramer; J W Stansbury; C N Bowman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  System compliance dictates the effect of composite filler content on polymerization shrinkage stress.

Authors:  Zhengzhi Wang; Martin Y M Chiang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.

Authors:  Stephanie Krifka; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Role of filler and functional group conversion in the evolution of properties in polymeric dental restoratives.

Authors:  Parag K Shah; Jeffrey W Stansbury
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Light Intensities and Curing Cycles of QTH, and LED Lights on Microleakage of Class V Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Anshu M Chandurkar; Sandeep S Metgud; Shaikh Shoeb Yakub; Vaishali J Kalburge; Basawaraj C Biradar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 6.  Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review.

Authors:  Dalia Kaisarly; Moataz El Gezawi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Effect of different composite modulation protocols on the conversion and polymerization stress profile of bulk-filled resin restorations.

Authors:  M C G Erhardt; M Goulart; R C Jacques; J A Rodrigues; C S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Effects of occlusal cavity configuration on 3D shrinkage vectors in a flowable composite.

Authors:  Dalia Kaisarly; Moataz El Gezawi; Guangyun Lai; Jian Jin; Peter Rösch; Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Shrinkage Stresses Generated during Resin-Composite Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Luis Felipe J Schneider; Larissa Maria Cavalcante; Nick Silikas
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-09-30

Review 10.  Strong nanocomposites with Ca, PO(4), and F release for caries inhibition.

Authors:  H H K Xu; M D Weir; L Sun; J L Moreau; S Takagi; L C Chow; J M Antonucci
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.