BACKGROUND: Regenerating gene type IV (RegIV) is a candidate marker for cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. In this study, its potential as a novel marker for the detection of gastric cancer peritoneal micrometastases was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RegIV mRNA levels in the peritoneal washes of 95 gastric cancer patients and 22 with benign disease were quantified by real-time RT-PCR. To examine whether expression of RegIV enhance tumorigenicity or not, thirty two mice were injected intraperitoneally or subcutaneously with RegIV transfectants of TMK-1 cells, parental TMK-1 cells, or neomycin control transfectants. RESULTS: RegIV expression was markedly higher in patients with peritoneal metastases compared to those without. The level of RegIV mRNA in gastric cancer patients was related to the extent of wall penetration. A cut-off value for RegIV-positive expression was based on an analysis of negative control patients with benign disease, and gastric cancer patients above the cut-off value constituted the micrometastasis (MM+) group. Based on this criteria, 3 out of 43 T1 or T2 cases were MM+ (93% specificity). Among 15 patients with peritoneal dissemination (7 out of 15 cases were positive by cytology), 14 cases were positive for RegIV expression (93% sensitivity), while analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA failed to detect micrometastases in 4 cases (73% sensitivity). Combined analysis of CEA and RegIV improved the accuracy of diagnosis to 100%. The prognosis of RegIV-positive cases was significantly worse than that of RegIV-negative cases. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model suggested that RegIV may be an independent prognostic factor. Stable expression of RegIV significantly enhanced peritoneal metastasis in an animal model of gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that RegIV mRNA expression has the potential to serve as a novel marker for detecting peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer.
BACKGROUND:Regenerating gene type IV (RegIV) is a candidate marker for cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. In this study, its potential as a novel marker for the detection of gastric cancer peritoneal micrometastases was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RegIV mRNA levels in the peritoneal washes of 95 gastric cancerpatients and 22 with benign disease were quantified by real-time RT-PCR. To examine whether expression of RegIV enhance tumorigenicity or not, thirty two mice were injected intraperitoneally or subcutaneously with RegIV transfectants of TMK-1 cells, parental TMK-1 cells, or neomycin control transfectants. RESULTS:RegIV expression was markedly higher in patients with peritoneal metastases compared to those without. The level of RegIV mRNA in gastric cancerpatients was related to the extent of wall penetration. A cut-off value for RegIV-positive expression was based on an analysis of negative control patients with benign disease, and gastric cancerpatients above the cut-off value constituted the micrometastasis (MM+) group. Based on this criteria, 3 out of 43 T1 or T2 cases were MM+ (93% specificity). Among 15 patients with peritoneal dissemination (7 out of 15 cases were positive by cytology), 14 cases were positive for RegIV expression (93% sensitivity), while analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA failed to detect micrometastases in 4 cases (73% sensitivity). Combined analysis of CEA and RegIV improved the accuracy of diagnosis to 100%. The prognosis of RegIV-positive cases was significantly worse than that of RegIV-negative cases. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model suggested that RegIV may be an independent prognostic factor. Stable expression of RegIV significantly enhanced peritoneal metastasis in an animal model of gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that RegIV mRNA expression has the potential to serve as a novel marker for detecting peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer.
Authors: Josane F Sousa; Amy-Joan L Ham; Corbin Whitwell; Ki Taek Nam; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang; Woo Ho Kim; Bing Zhang; Ming Li; Bonnie LaFleur; Daniel C Liebler; James R Goldenring Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2012-09-01 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Aude Legoffic; Ezequiel Calvo; Carla Cano; Emma Folch-Puy; Marc Barthet; Jean Robert Delpero; Montse Ferrés-Masó; Jean Charles Dagorn; Daniel Closa; Juan Iovanna Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mathieu Pecqueux; Johannes Fritzmann; Mariam Adamu; Kristian Thorlund; Christoph Kahlert; Christoph Reißfelder; Jürgen Weitz; Nuh N Rahbari Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-11-03