Literature DB >> 18504844

Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation--a review of methods and applications.

Stina Alriksson1, Tomas Oberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM AND SCOPE: Conjoint analysis and the related choice-modelling methods have been used for many years in marketing research to evaluate consumer behaviour and preferences for different kinds of product attributes. Recently, the number of applications in environmental science and management has started to grow. Conjoint analysis is found in many different forms, and the environmental studies evaluated in this review display the same range of methods as in other fields. The key characteristic of all these methods is that trade-offs are evaluated by jointly considering a number of important attributes. MAIN FEATURES: This paper is a review of the literature on environmental applications of conjoint analysis and assesses in which environmental area conjoint analysis has been most successful. The method and the design of the studies are reviewed as well.
RESULTS: A total of 84 studies were found, dealing with environmental issues that were evaluated by conjoint analysis. The studies concern agriculture, ecosystem management, energy, environmental evaluation, forestry, land management, pollution, products, recreation, environmental risk analysis and waste management. DISCUSSION: Choice experiments seem to have a comparatively stronger position in environmental studies than elsewhere. Most of the environmental applications are related to natural resource management. This is somewhat surprising, but a number of reports have appeared also on product evaluation, which could be a key application area in the future.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to marketing and transportation, the number of environmental conjoint studies is rather small but increasing, and the method has proven to work effectively in eliciting preferences on environmental issues. In environmental issues, experimenters often use choice experiments, especially concerning ecosystem management and environmental evaluations. When it comes to evaluating preferences concerning agriculture, forestry, energy and products, a more traditional approach of conjoint analysis is favoured. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Two new areas of application are identified in this review--environmental communication and expert elicitation. Conjoint analysis can thus be developed into a useful instrument for environmental risk analysis and communication, both of which are necessary for an efficient approach to risk governance.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18504844     DOI: 10.1065/espr2008.02.479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  13 in total

1.  The use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica.

Authors:  Robert R Hearne; Zenia M Salinas
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Evaluating the multiple benefits of marine water quality improvements: how important are health risk reductions?

Authors:  Fernando S Machado; Susana Mourato
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  An estimation of the social costs of landfill siting using a choice experiment.

Authors:  Toshiaki Sasao
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 7.145

4.  Using choice experiments to assess people's preferences for railway transports of hazardous materials.

Authors:  Lena Winslott Hiselius
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive.

Authors:  Nick Hanley; Robert E Wright; Begona Alvarez-Farizo
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application.

Authors:  Ekin Birol; Katia Karousakis; Phoebe Koundouri
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Estimating the public preferences for solid waste management programmes using choice experiments in Macao.

Authors:  Jianjun Jin; Zhishi Wang; Shenghong Ran
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2006-08

8.  Conjoint analysis: a useful tool for assessing preferences for environmental issues.

Authors:  Stina Alriksson; Tomas Oberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Differences and similarities among experts' opinions on Salmonella enterica dynamics in swine pre-harvest.

Authors:  Katharina D C Stärk; Anne Wingstrand; Jan Dahl; Vibeke Møgelmose; Danilo M A Lo Fo Wong
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.

Authors:  M Ryan; D A Scott; C Reeves; A Bate; E R van Teijlingen; E M Russell; M Napper; C M Robb
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  6 in total

1.  Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.

Authors:  Kuang-Yi Wen; David H Gustafson; Robert P Hawkins; Patricia F Brennan; Susan Dinauer; Pauley R Johnson; Tracy Siegler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Assessing the external benefits of contaminated soil remediation in Korea: a choice experiment study.

Authors:  Seul-Ye Lim; Hyo-Jin Kim; Seung-Hoon Yoo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Important factors for public acceptance of the final disposal of contaminated soil and wastes resulting from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident.

Authors:  Momo Takada; Kosuke Shirai; Michio Murakami; Susumu Ohnuma; Jun Nakatani; Kazuo Yamada; Masahiro Osako; Tetsuo Yasutaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Valuation of mortality risk attributable to climate change: investigating the effect of survey administration modes on a VSL.

Authors:  Milan Sčasný; Anna Alberini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients' Preferences and Personalize Care.

Authors:  Basem Al-Omari; Joviana Farhat; Mai Ershaid
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-13

6.  Application of Conjoint Analysis to Improve Reliability of Dietician Consultation in Pediatric Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Sakil Kulkarni; Kim Liss; Charles M Samson
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2017-06-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.