BACKGROUND: Prediction of left ventricular functional recovery is important after myocardial infarction. The impact of quantitative perfusion and motion analyses with gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on predictive ability has not been clearly defined in multi-center studies. METHODS: A total of 252 patients with recent myocardial infarction (n = 74) and old myocardial infarction (n = 175) were registered from 25 institutions. All patients underwent resting gated SPECT using (99m)Tc-hexakis-2-methoxy-isobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) and repeated the study after revascularization after an average follow-up period of 132 +/- 81 days. Visual and quantitative assessment of perfusion and wall motion were performed in 5,040 segments. RESULTS: Non-gated segmental percent uptake and end-systolic (ES) percent uptake were good predictors of wall motion recovery and significantly differed between improved and non-improved groups (66 +/- 17% and 55 +/- 18%, p < 0.0001 for non-gated; 64 +/- 16% and 51 +/- 17% for ES percent uptake, p < 0.0001). The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics curve for non-gated percent uptake, ES percent uptake, end-diastolic percent uptake and visual perfusion defect score was 0.70, 0.71, 0.61, and 0.56, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of percent uptake were 68% and 64% for non-gated map and 80% and 52% for ES percent uptake map. An optimal threshold for predicting segmental improvement was 63% for non-gated and 52% for ES percent uptake values. CONCLUSION: Segmental (99m)Tc-MIBI uptake provided a useful predictor of wall motion improvement. Application of quantitative approach with non-gated and ES percent uptake enhanced predictive accuracy over visual analysis particularly in a multi-center study.
BACKGROUND: Prediction of left ventricular functional recovery is important after myocardial infarction. The impact of quantitative perfusion and motion analyses with gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on predictive ability has not been clearly defined in multi-center studies. METHODS: A total of 252 patients with recent myocardial infarction (n = 74) and old myocardial infarction (n = 175) were registered from 25 institutions. All patients underwent resting gated SPECT using (99m)Tc-hexakis-2-methoxy-isobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) and repeated the study after revascularization after an average follow-up period of 132 +/- 81 days. Visual and quantitative assessment of perfusion and wall motion were performed in 5,040 segments. RESULTS: Non-gated segmental percent uptake and end-systolic (ES) percent uptake were good predictors of wall motion recovery and significantly differed between improved and non-improved groups (66 +/- 17% and 55 +/- 18%, p < 0.0001 for non-gated; 64 +/- 16% and 51 +/- 17% for ES percent uptake, p < 0.0001). The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics curve for non-gated percent uptake, ES percent uptake, end-diastolic percent uptake and visual perfusion defect score was 0.70, 0.71, 0.61, and 0.56, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of percent uptake were 68% and 64% for non-gated map and 80% and 52% for ES percent uptake map. An optimal threshold for predicting segmental improvement was 63% for non-gated and 52% for ES percent uptake values. CONCLUSION: Segmental (99m)Tc-MIBI uptake provided a useful predictor of wall motion improvement. Application of quantitative approach with non-gated and ES percent uptake enhanced predictive accuracy over visual analysis particularly in a multi-center study.
Authors: Jeroen J Bax; Jamshid Maddahi; Don Poldermans; Abdou Elhendy; Jan H Cornel; Eric Boersma; Jos R T C Roelandt; Paolo M Fioretti Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: P Marzullo; G Sambuceti; O Parodi; A Gimelli; E Picano; A Giorgetti; A L'Abbate Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1995 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: J vom Dahl; C Altehoefer; F H Sheehan; P Buechin; G Schulz; E R Schwarz; K C Koch; R Uebis; B J Messmer; U Buell; P Hanrath Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M Arnese; J H Cornel; A Salustri; A Maat; A Elhendy; A E Reijs; F J Ten Cate; D Keane; A H Balk; J R Roelandt Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-06-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N Tamaki; M Kawamoto; N Takahashi; Y Yonekura; Y Magata; R Nohara; H Kambara; S Sasayama; K Hirata; T Ban Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: G Lucignani; G Paolini; C Landoni; M Zuccari; G Paganelli; L Galli; G Di Credico; G Vanoli; C Rossetti; M A Mariani Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 1992
Authors: Samaneh Salimian; Bernard Thibault; Vincent Finnerty; Jean Grégoire; François Harel Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 5.952