Literature DB >> 18504114

Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.

Caitlin J Butte1, Yu Zhang, Huangqiang Song, Jack J Jiang.   

Abstract

Previous research has used perturbation analysis methods to study the singing voice. Using perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) methods in conjunction may provide more accurate information on the singing voice and may distinguish vocal usage in different styles. Acoustic samples from different styles of singing were compared using nonlinear dynamic and perturbation measures. Twenty-six songs from different musical styles were obtained from an online music database (Rhapsody, RealNetworks, Inc., Seattle, WA). One-second samples were selected from each song for analysis. Perturbation analyses of jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio and NDA of correlation dimension (D(2)) were performed on samples from each singing style. Percent jitter and shimmer median values were low normal for country (0.32% and 3.82%), musical theater (MT) (0.280% and 2.80%), jazz (0.440% and 2.34%), and soul (0.430% and 6.42%). The popular style had slightly higher median jitter and shimmer values (1.13% and 6.78%) than other singing styles, although this was not statistically significant. The opera singing style had median jitter of 0.520%, and yielded significantly high shimmer (P=0.001) of 7.72%. All six singing styles were measured reliably using NDA, indicating that operatic singing is notably more chaotic than other singing styles. Median correlation dimension values were low to normal, compared to healthy voices, in country (median D(2)=2.14), jazz (median D(2)=2.24), pop (median D(2)=2.60), MT (median D(2)=2.73), and soul (mean D(2)=3.26). Correlation dimension was significantly higher in opera (P<0.001) with median D(2)=6.19. In this study, acoustic analysis in opera singing gave significantly high values for shimmer and D(2), suggesting that it is more irregular than other singing styles; a previously unknown quality of opera singing. Perturbation analysis also suggested significant differences in vocal output in different singing styles. This preliminary study using acoustic analysis with nonlinear dynamic measures and perturbation measures may represent a valuable procedure in quantitatively describing the properties of the singing voice. Further research with human test subjects may allow us to characterize singing styles and diagnose vocal dysfunction in the singing voice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18504114      PMCID: PMC3313593          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  18 in total

1.  Analysis of vocal disorders in a feature space.

Authors:  L Matassini; R Hegger; H Kantz; C Manfredi
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices.

Authors:  W S Brown; H B Rothman; C M Sapienza
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Describing different styles of singing: a comparison of a female singer's voice source in "Classical", "Pop", "Jazz" and "Blues".

Authors:  M Thalén; J Sundberg
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.487

4.  Instrumental and perceptual evaluations of two related singers.

Authors:  Eugene H Buder; Teresa Wolf
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Nonlinear dynamics of phonations in excised larynx experiments.

Authors:  Jack J Jiang; Yu Zhang; Charles N Ford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Long-term-average spectrum characteristics of country singers during speaking and singing.

Authors:  T F Cleveland; J Sundberg; R E Stone
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Nonlinear phenomena in contemporary vocal music.

Authors:  Jürgen Neubauer; Michael Edgerton; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Acoustic analyses of sustained and running voices from patients with laryngeal pathologies.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  Chaos in voice, from modeling to measurement.

Authors:  Jack J Jiang; Yu Zhang; Clancy McGilligan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analyses of voices from patients with unilateral laryngeal paralysis.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang; Laura Biazzo; Malinda Jorgensen
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of adult male smokers.

Authors:  Lingying Chai; Alicia J Sprecher; Yi Zhang; Yufang Liang; Huijun Chen; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.009

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.