Literature DB >> 18503844

Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.

Wei-Hsiu Chang1, Hsueh-Ching Tseng, Ting-Kuang Chao, Chuan-Jen Hsu, Tien-Chen Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate speech performance and subjective outcomes for older individuals who have hearing impairment and use digital hearing aids. The outcomes between young and old elderly users were compared. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with hearing loss fitted with digital hearing aids were included. They were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 32 subjects aged 65 to 80 years, whereas group B had 27 subjects older than 80 years. Speech performance and subjective outcomes were measured 4 months after fitting of hearing aids. Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S), Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI), satisfaction, and usage questionnaires were used as subjective assessments.
RESULTS: Improvements in speech performance were not significantly different between these two groups. There were no statistical differences in terms of HHIE-S score reduction, satisfaction rate, daily usage time, and COSI scores between both groups.
CONCLUSION: Age by itself is not a limiting factor for older patients with hearing impairment to benefit from digital hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18503844     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  8 in total

1.  Satisfaction with Hearing Aids among Aged Patients with Different Degrees of Hearing Loss and Length of Daily Use.

Authors:  Rezvan Dashti; Farzad Faraji Khiavi; Seyyed Jalal Sameni; Arash Bayat
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-04-17

Review 2.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

3.  Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids.

Authors:  Xunyi Wang; Yun Zheng; Yiran Liu; Jingzhe Lu; Zhiyuan Cui; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Satisfaction and compliance of adult patients using hearing aid and evaluation of factors affecting them.

Authors:  Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz; Ömer Bayır; Serap Er; Eray Işık; Güleser Saylam; Emel Çadallı Tatar; Ali Özdek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoppe; Gerhard Hesse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

6.  Self-Reported Benefit and Satisfaction with a Beamforming Body-Worn Hearing Aid for Elderly Adults.

Authors:  Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-01

7.  Validation of the Swedish Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Screening Version) and Evaluation of Its Effect in Hearing Aid Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Maria Öberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature.

Authors:  Krupa R Patel; David J Phillips; Jason M Leibowitz; Theresa Scognamiglio; Victoria E Banuchi; William I Kuhel; David I Kutler; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-01-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.