Literature DB >> 18503815

The validity of the lag signs in diagnosing full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a preliminary investigation.

Caroline A Miller1, Gail A Forrester, Jeremy S Lewis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the lag signs were valid tools in diagnosing full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff.
DESIGN: A same-subject, correlation, double-blinded design was used. The results of the external rotation lag sign, drop sign, and internal rotation lag sign were compared with the criterion standard of diagnostic ultrasound to establish their accuracy.
SETTING: A regional orthopedic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive subjects (N=37), 21 women and 16 men, with shoulder pain referred to a consultant orthopedic surgeon specializing in shoulder conditions were recruited for this investigation.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of the lag signs when using ultrasound as the reference test.
RESULTS: The specificities of the drop sign and internal rotation lag sign were 77% and 84%, respectively, which, together with low positive likelihood ratios 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-6.7) and 6.2 (95% CI, 1.9-12.0), indicate that a positive result was poor at recognizing the presence of full-thickness tears. The drop sign had a sensitivity of 73% with a negative likelihood ratio of .34 (95% CI, 0.2-0.8), suggesting that a negative test was fair at ruling out the presence of full-thickness tears. The sensitivity of the internal rotation lag sign (100%) supported by the negative likelihood ratio of 0 (95% CI, 0.0-2.5) suggests that a negative test will effectively rule out the presence of full-thickness tears of the subscapularis. A positive external rotation lag sign is the clinical test most likely to indicate that full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus are present (specificity, 94%). However, the external rotation lag sign did demonstrate a low sensitivity score of 46% and negative likelihood ratio of .57 (95% CI, 0.4-0.9), which means that a negative test will not rule out the presence of full-thickness tears.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this investigation suggest that a clinical diagnosis of a full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff cannot be conclusively reached using one or more of the lag signs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18503815     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  14 in total

1.  I.S.Mu.L.T - Rotator Cuff Tears Guidelines.

Authors:  Francesco Oliva; Eleonora Piccirilli; Michela Bossa; Alessio Giai Via; Alessandra Colombo; Claudio Chillemi; Giuseppe Gasparre; Leonardo Pellicciari; Edoardo Franceschetti; Clelia Rugiero; Alessandro Scialdoni; Filippo Vittadini; Paola Brancaccio; Domenico Creta; Angelo Del Buono; Raffaele Garofalo; Francesco Franceschi; Antonio Frizziero; Asmaa Mahmoud; Giovanni Merolla; Simone Nicoletti; Marco Spoliti; Leonardo Osti; Johnny Padulo; Nicola Portinaro; Gianfranco Tajana; Alex Castagna; Calogero Foti; Stefano Masiero; Giuseppe Porcellini; Umberto Tarantino; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-02-13

2.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Special Tests for Rotator Cuff Tear: The ROW Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Jennifer Luz; Laurence D Higgins; Yan Dong; Jon J P Warner; Elizabeth Matzkin; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Frequency of use of clinical shoulder examination tests by experienced shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Aaron D Sciascia; Tracy Spigelman; W Ben Kibler; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Clinical examination of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Reg B Wilcox; Jeffrey N Katz; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination features for identifying large rotator cuff tears in primary health care.

Authors:  Angela Cadogan; Peter McNair; Mark Laslett; Wayne Hing; Stephen Taylor
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-08

6.  History and physical examination provide little guidance on diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2013-12-17

Review 7.  Physical tests for shoulder impingements and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement.

Authors:  Nigel C A Hanchard; Mário Lenza; Helen H G Handoll; Yemisi Takwoingi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 8.  Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  Sigmund Ø Gismervik; Jon O Drogset; Fredrik Granviken; Magne Rø; Gunnar Leivseth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Effects of kinesiotaping added to a rehabilitation programme for patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled trial addressing symptoms, functional limitations and underlying deficits.

Authors:  Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Benoît Pairot de Fontenay; Laurent Julien Bouyer; François Desmeules; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Kinesiotaping for the Rehabilitation of Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Benoit Pairot de Fontenay; Laurent Julien Bouyer; François Desmeules; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.