Literature DB >> 18503684

Deposition of nickel, chromium, and cobalt on the skin in some occupations - assessment by acid wipe sampling.

Carola Lidén1, Lizbet Skare, Gun Nise, Marie Vahter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nickel, chromium, and cobalt are important skin sensitizers. Better knowledge about skin exposure is needed for more efficient prevention. We have previously developed acid wipe sampling for assessment of skin exposure to metals.
OBJECTIVES: To apply the acid wipe sampling technique in some occupations where intense contact with metallic items occurs and to gather experience for the design of future workplace studies.
METHODS: 18 volunteers (carpenters, locksmiths, cashiers, and secretaries as controls) participated. They performed their normal tasks during a job session for exposure. Samples were taken from fingers and palms by acid wipe sampling, and analysis of metals was performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer.
RESULTS: The metals were detected in all samples, and the amount of nickel was larger than that of chromium and cobalt. Fingers were more exposed than palms. 8-h exposure to nickel was calculated and was highest in locksmiths (mean 3.784 mug/cm(2), range 1.846-5.028 mug/cm(2)) followed by carpenters, cashiers, and secretaries.
CONCLUSIONS: The acid wipe sampling technique is suitable for studies of skin exposure to nickel, chromium, and cobalt in the workplace. The sampling efficiency of acid wipe sampling is high. The amounts of nickel deposited on skin in carpenters, locksmiths, and cashiers are judged capable of eliciting allergic contact dermatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18503684     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01326.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  7 in total

1.  GuLF DREAM: A Model to Estimate Dermal Exposure Among Oil Spill Response and Clean-up Workers.

Authors:  Melanie Gorman Ng; John W Cherrie; Anne Sleeuwenhoek; Mark Stenzel; Richard K Kwok; Lawrence S Engel; Jennifer M Cavallari; Aaron Blair; Dale P Sandler; Patricia Stewart
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 2.  Potential health effects associated with dermal exposure to occupational chemicals.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; B Jean Meade
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2014-12-17

3.  Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?

Authors:  Rosemary L Nixon; Claire L Higgins; Danit Maor; Harini Rajgopal Bala; Alka Lalji; Katherine E Heim
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  A Case Study of Brass Foundry Workers' Estimated Lead (Pb) Body Burden from Different Exposure Routes.

Authors:  Anneli Julander; Klara Midander; Sandra Garcia-Garcia; Per Vihlborg; Pål Graff
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Combined Metallomics/Transcriptomics Profiling Reveals a Major Role for Metals in Wound Repair.

Authors:  Holly N Wilkinson; Barbara-Ann Guinn; Matthew J Hardman
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-11-30

6.  Nickel penetration into stratum corneum in FLG null carriers-A human experimental study.

Authors:  Anneli Julander; Emelie Rietz Liljedahl; Helena Korres de Paula; Eva Assarsson; Malin Engfeldt; Margareta Littorin; Christine Shobana Anto; Carola Lidén; Karin Broberg
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.419

7.  Biological monitoring of dermal and air exposure to cobalt at a Swedish hard metal production plant: does dermal exposure contribute to uptake?

Authors:  Maria Klasson; Magnus Lindberg; Ing-Liss Bryngelsson; Helena Arvidsson; Carin Pettersson; Bente Husby; Håkan Westberg
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.