AIM: This paper is a report of a study to determine the effectiveness of jaw and total body relaxation for postoperative pain, anxiety and level of relaxation, and to determine any patient expectancy effects. BACKGROUND:Relaxation is increasingly suggested as a pain control technique that can be used by nurses in daily practice. A systematic review of the effectiveness of relaxation for postoperative pain relief revealed many poorly designed studies and only some weak evidence supporting the use of relaxation for postoperative pain. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial (n = 118) was conducted between 2002 and 2003 to compare total body relaxation, jaw relaxation, attention control and usual care. Consenting patients admitted for elective orthopaedic surgery aged 18 or over, able to speak English and able to tense and relax more than two muscle groups were included. Pain at rest and on movement, anxiety and relaxation were assessed at pre-admission clinic, pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention and 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours later. However, the trial was under-powered. FINDINGS: There were statistically significant reductions in pain at rest from pre- to post-intervention for both the relaxation groups and the attention control group. The usual care group had a small increase in pain, whilst the other three groups had similar small decreases in pain. There was no statistically significant difference in anxiety or relaxation scores pre- to post-intervention between groups. CONCLUSION: Jaw relaxation could give these orthopaedic patients a small, very short-lasting additional amount of pain relief, and it may be that staff and patients feel this small benefit to be worthwhile.
RCT Entities:
AIM: This paper is a report of a study to determine the effectiveness of jaw and total body relaxation for postoperative pain, anxiety and level of relaxation, and to determine any patient expectancy effects. BACKGROUND: Relaxation is increasingly suggested as a pain control technique that can be used by nurses in daily practice. A systematic review of the effectiveness of relaxation for postoperative pain relief revealed many poorly designed studies and only some weak evidence supporting the use of relaxation for postoperative pain. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial (n = 118) was conducted between 2002 and 2003 to compare total body relaxation, jaw relaxation, attention control and usual care. Consenting patients admitted for elective orthopaedic surgery aged 18 or over, able to speak English and able to tense and relax more than two muscle groups were included. Pain at rest and on movement, anxiety and relaxation were assessed at pre-admission clinic, pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention and 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours later. However, the trial was under-powered. FINDINGS: There were statistically significant reductions in pain at rest from pre- to post-intervention for both the relaxation groups and the attention control group. The usual care group had a small increase in pain, whilst the other three groups had similar small decreases in pain. There was no statistically significant difference in anxiety or relaxation scores pre- to post-intervention between groups. CONCLUSION:Jaw relaxation could give these orthopaedic patients a small, very short-lasting additional amount of pain relief, and it may be that staff and patients feel this small benefit to be worthwhile.
Authors: Sarah E LaFave; Marianne Granbom; Thomas K M Cudjoe; Alex Gottsch; Gerard Shorb; Sarah L Szanton Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Sherry L Pagoto; Mary M McDermott; George Reed; Philip Greenland; Kathy M Mazor; Judith K Ockene; Matt Whited; Kristin Schneider; Brad Appelhans; Kathy Leung; Philip Merriam; Ira Ockene Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Danielle G Weekes; Richard E Campbell; Eric D Wicks; Christopher J Hadley; Zaira S Chaudhry; Aaron H Carter; Matthew D Pepe; Bradford S Tucker; Kevin B Freedman; Fotios P Tjoumakaris Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Sarah C Keogh; Kenzo Fry; Edwin Mbugua; Mark Ayallo; Heidi Quinn; George Otieno; Thoai D Ngo Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Rachael Powell; Neil W Scott; Anne Manyande; Julie Bruce; Claus Vögele; Lucie M T Byrne-Davis; Mary Unsworth; Christian Osmer; Marie Johnston Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-05-26