Literature DB >> 18503564

Rufinamide: clinical pharmacokinetics and concentration-response relationships in patients with epilepsy.

Emilio Perucca1, James Cloyd, David Critchley, Eliane Fuseau.   

Abstract

Rufinamide is a new, orally active antiepileptic drug (AED), which has been found to be effective in the treatment of partial seizures and drop attacks associated with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. When taken with food, rufinamide is relatively well absorbed in the lower dose range, with approximately dose-proportional plasma concentrations up to 1,600 mg/day, but less than dose-proportional plasma concentrations at higher doses due to reduced oral bioavailability. Rufinamide is not extensively bound to plasma proteins. During repeated dosing, steady state is reached within 2 days, consistent with its elimination half-life of 6-10 h. The apparent volume of distribution (V(d)/F) and apparent oral clearance (CL/F) are related to body size, the best predictor being body surface area. Rufinamide is not a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes and is extensively metabolized via hydrolysis by carboxylesterases to a pharmacologically inactive carboxylic acid derivative, which is excreted in the urine. Rufinamide pharmacokinetics are not affected by impaired renal function. Potential differences in rufinamide pharmacokinetics between children and adults have not been investigated systematically in formal studies. Although population pharmacokinetic modeling suggests that in the absence of interacting comedication rufinamide CL/F may be higher in children than in adults, a meaningful comparison of data across age groups is complicated by age-related differences in doses and in proportion of patients receiving drugs known to increase or to decrease rufinamide CL/F. A study investigating the effect of rufinamide on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A4 substrate triazolam and an oral contraceptive interaction study showed that rufinamide has some enzyme-inducing potential in man. Findings from population pharmacokinetic modeling indicate that rufinamide does not modify the CL/F of topiramate or valproic acid, but may slightly increase the CL/F of carbamazepine and lamotrigine and slightly decrease the CL/F of phenobarbital and phenytoin (all predicted changes were <20%). These changes in the pharmacokinetics of associated AEDs are unlikely to make it necessary to change the dosages of these AEDs given concomitantly with rufinamide, with the exception that consideration should be given to reducing the dose of phenytoin. Based on population pharmacokinetic modeling, lamotrigine, topiramate, or benzodiazepines do not affect the pharmacokinetics of rufinamide, but valproic acid may increase plasma rufinamide concentrations, especially in children in whom plasma rufinamide concentrations could be increased substantially. Conversely, comedication with carbamazepine, vigabatrin, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone was associated with a slight-to-moderate decrease in plasma rufinamide concentrations, ranging from a minimum of -13.7% in female children comedicated with vigabatrin to a maximum of -46.3% in female adults comedicated with phenytoin, phenobarbital, or primidone. In population modeling using data from placebo-controlled trials, a positive correlation has been identified between reduction in seizure frequency and steady-state plasma rufinamide concentrations. The probability of adverse effects also appears to be concentration-related.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18503564     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01665.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  36 in total

Review 1.  Key factors in the discovery and development of new antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  Meir Bialer; H Steve White
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Rufinamide Following Single and Multiple Oral Doses and Effect of Food on Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

Authors:  Mingzhen Xu; Yang Ni; Ying Zhou; Xiaomeng He; Huqun Li; Hui Chen; Weiyong Li
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 3.  Antiepileptic Drug Removal by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  The Pharmacology and Toxicology of Third-Generation Anticonvulsant Drugs.

Authors:  Paul LaPenna; Laura M Tormoehlen
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-16

Review 5.  The role of human carboxylesterases in drug metabolism: have we overlooked their importance?

Authors:  S Casey Laizure; Vanessa Herring; Zheyi Hu; Kevin Witbrodt; Robert B Parker
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.705

6.  Supporting the recommended paediatric dosing regimen for rufinamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome using clinical trial simulation.

Authors:  M Marchand; E Fuseau; D J Critchley
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Treating Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in epileptic pediatric patients with third-generation rufinamide.

Authors:  Jessica Gresham; Lea S Eiland; Allison M Chung
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-11

9.  Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: overview and recent findings.

Authors:  Kenou van Rijckevorsel
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Update on the management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome with a focus on rufinamide.

Authors:  Carl E Stafstrom
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.