Literature DB >> 18503396

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in hospitalized patients.

S Christian Cheatham1, Michael B Kays, David W Smith, Matthew F Wack, Kevin M Sowinski.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem 500 mg every 6, 8, and 12 hours, based on renal function, in hospitalized patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, steady-state pharmacokinetic study.
SETTING: One tertiary care medical center and one community hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty adult patients (12 men, 8 women) with suspected or documented bacterial infections requiring antimicrobial therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients received 30-minute infusions of meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours (group 1), every 8 hours (group 2), or every 12 hours (group 3) based on estimated creatinine clearances greater than 60, 40-60, or 10-39 ml/minute, respectively.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were collected after 2 or more days of therapy. Meropenem concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 patients) were performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for a percentage of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 40% by using pharmacokinetic data for each group and MIC data for seven gram-negative pathogens from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC, 2004-2005) database. Maximum and minimum serum concentrations (mean +/- SD) were 29.2+/-9.8 and 2.4+/-1.1 microg/ml, 33.2+/-8.5 and 3.8+/-2.7 microg/ml, and 33.5+/-4.7 and 4.9+/-1.6 microg/ml for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The half-life values were 2.5+/-0.9, 3.4+/-1.3, and 6.1+/-1.4 hours, and the values for volume of distribution at steady state were 29.3+/-8.7, 23.8+/-8.1, and 28.7+/-8.6 L for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For all three groups, the CFR was greater than 90% for the enteric pathogens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 82.4-85.2% for Acinetobacter species.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacodynamic analyses suggest that regimens of meropenem 500 mg every 6, 8, or 12 hours, adjusted for renal function, are acceptable for treatment of infections caused by enteric gram-negative pathogens and P. aeruginosa. However, more aggressive dosing or alternative dosing strategies may be necessary for Acinetobacter species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18503396     DOI: 10.1592/phco.28.6.691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  3 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Clinical Outcomes Associated with Two Meropenem Dosing Strategies.

Authors:  Kyle John Wilby; Ziad Ghantous Nasr; Shereen Elazzazy; Tim T Y Lau; Anas Hamad
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2017-03

2.  Dose optimization of β-lactams antibiotics in pediatrics and adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abdul Haseeb; Hani Saleh Faidah; Saleh Alghamdi; Amal F Alotaibi; Mahmoud Essam Elrggal; Ahmad J Mahrous; Safa S Almarzoky Abuhussain; Najla A Obaid; Manal Algethamy; Abdullmoin AlQarni; Asim A Khogeer; Zikria Saleem; Muhammad Shahid Iqbal; Sami S Ashgar; Rozan Mohammad Radwan; Alaa Mutlaq; Nayyra Fatani; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 3.  Clinical review: balancing the therapeutic, safety, and economic issues underlying effective antipseudomonal carbapenem use.

Authors:  Thomas G Slama
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.