Literature DB >> 18503344

Prediction of intracranial edema after radiosurgery of meningiomas.

Josef Novotný1, Aurelia Kollová, Roman Liscák.   

Abstract

OBJECT: This study was focused on the development of models with which to predict the occurrence of intracranial edema after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) of meningiomas, based on clinical and imaging data collected in a large group of patients.
METHODS: Data in 368 patients with 381 meningiomas treated using the Leksell Gamma Knife unit were analyzed. Follow up of more than 24 months was available in 331 patients (90%); this time period ranged from 24 to 120 months (median 51 months). The actuarial tumor control rate was 97.9% at 5 years. Perilesional edema after GKS was radiologically confirmed in 51 patients (15.4%) and 32 of them (9.7%) were symptomatic; symptoms were temporary in 23 (6.9%) and permanent in nine (2.7%). Ten different factors were proposed as potential predictors for the occurrence of the intracranial edema after GKS: patient's sex, patient's age, previous surgery, edema before GKS treatment, lobulated margin of meningioma, heterogeneous appearance of the tumor, tumor volume, tumor location, maximum dose to the tumor, and dose to the tumor margin. To identify factors having influence on edema occurrence, univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. There was a significant difference in the incidence of edema for different patient age groups and a significantly higher incidence of edema occurrence in patients in whom no surgical procedure was performed before GKS, those with edema present before GKS, those with a tumor volume larger than 10 cm3, those in whom the tumor was located in the anterior fossa, those in whom the maximum dose to the tumor was higher than 30 Gy, and for different tumor margin doses. A binary logistic regression multifactorial prediction model was used to identify the following significant factors to predict of edema occurrence after GKS: previous surgery, edema before the treatment, tumor volume, tumor location, and tumor margin dose.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these models estimates of the occurrence of edema after the GKS can be made, and consequently treatment parameters can be adjusted to reduce the occurrence of edema. These results may provide grounds for additional patient care such as more frequent follow up or possibly administration of steroids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 18503344     DOI: 10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  14 in total

1.  A review of stereotactic radiosurgery practice in the management of skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Elena Vera; J Bryan Iorgulescu; Daniel M S Raper; Karthik Madhavan; Brian E Lally; Jacques Morcos; Samy Elhammady; Jonathan Sherman; Ricardo J Komotar
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-03-12

2.  Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial meningiomas: results of the first 5 years of clinical practice.

Authors:  Osama S Abdelaziz; Alaa Kandil; Shaaban El-Assaal; Amro Abdelaziz; Yosry Rostom; Yaser Rashed
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Post-radiosurgical edema associated with parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jason P Sheehan; Or Cohen-Inbar; Rawee Ruangkanchanasetr; S Bulent Omay; Judith Hess; Veronica Chiang; Christian Iorio-Morin; Michelle Alonso-Basanta; David Mathieu; Inga S Grills; John Y K Lee; Cheng-Chia Lee; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: how can we differentiate between treatment effect and disease progression?

Authors:  Amanda J Walker; Jake Ruzevick; Ashkan A Malayeri; Daniele Rigamonti; Michael Lim; Kristin J Redmond; Lawrence Kleinberg
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 5.  State-of-the-art treatment alternatives for base of skull meningiomas: complementing and controversial indications for neurosurgery, stereotactic and robotic based radiosurgery or modern fractionated radiation techniques.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Ute Ganswindt; Robert L Foote; Douglas Kondziolka; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Change in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor after gamma knife radiosurgery for meningioma: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Seong-Hyun Park; Jeong-Hyun Hwang; Sung-Kyoo Hwang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery of Grade I Intracranial Meningiomas.

Authors:  Sara Alatriste-Martínez; Sergio Moreno-Jiménez; Guillermo A Gutiérrez-Aceves; José de Jesús Suárez-Campos; Olivia Amanda García-Garduño; Alejandro Rosas-Cabral; Miguel Ángel Celis-López
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2019-03-07

8.  Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas: Do we need to treat the dural tail? A single-center retrospective analysis and an overview of the literature.

Authors:  Vincent J Bulthuis; Patrick E J Hanssens; Suan Te Lie; Jacobus J van Overbeeke
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-09-05

9.  Peritumoral Brain Edema after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Asymptomatic Intracranial Meningiomas: Risks and Pattern of Evolution.

Authors:  Yeon Hoe; Young Jae Choi; Jeong Hoon Kim; Do Hoon Kwon; Chang Jin Kim; Young Hyun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

10.  The positive effects of surgery on symptomatic stereotactic radiation-induced peritumoral brain edema: A report of three cases.

Authors:  Roberto Stefini; Stefano Peron; Alessandro Lacamera; Andrea Cividini; Pietro Fiaschi; Giovanni Marco Sicuri
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.