Literature DB >> 18502593

Chimpanzees fail to plan in an exchange task but succeed in a tool-using procedure.

V Dufour1, E H M Sterck.   

Abstract

Planning has long been considered a uniquely human capacity. Lately, however, it has been shown that apes and a corvid species act now to derive a material future benefit. Since primates are highly social animals and their sociality is considered a strong selective force that resulted in complex cognitive capacities, planning is also expected in social situations. Unfortunately, prompting from social partners cannot be excluded in a social setting. Therefore, we controlled for this factor by testing the capacity to plan in chimpanzees using an exchange paradigm, that involves both a material and a social component, and a tool-use paradigm, similar to the one used on two other ape species. All chimpanzees failed to plan in the exchange task, but three individuals showed planning behavior in the tool-use task. Our methods controlled for the fact that chimpanzees were not prompted by the visibility of the reward at the moment of planning and also could not repeat a previously acquired routine. The best interpretation for our results is that chimpanzees can plan. However, planning was limited to the situation where the action to attain the future benefit only depended on a chimpanzee's own behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18502593     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

Review 1.  The future of future-oriented cognition in non-humans: theory and the empirical case of the great apes.

Authors:  Mathias Osvath; Gema Martin-Ordas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Spontaneous innovation for future deception in a male chimpanzee.

Authors:  Mathias Osvath; Elin Karvonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) fail a what-where-when task but find rewards by using a location-based association strategy.

Authors:  Marusha Dekleva; Valérie Dufour; Han de Vries; Berry M Spruijt; Elisabeth H M Sterck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) exploit tortoises (Kinixys erosa) via percussive technology.

Authors:  Simone Pika; Harmonie Klein; Sarah Bunel; Pauline Baas; Erwan Théleste; Tobias Deschner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  What animals do not do or fail to find: A novel observational approach for studying cognition in the wild.

Authors:  Karline R L Janmaat
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  Episodic memory: a comparative approach.

Authors:  Gema Martin-Ordas; Josep Call
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Great apes can defer exchange: a replication with different results suggesting future oriented behavior.

Authors:  Mathias Osvath; Tomas Persson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-02

Review 8.  A spoon full of studies helps the comparison go down: a comparative analysis of Tulving's spoon test.

Authors:  Damian Scarf; Christopher Smith; Michael Stuart
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.