Literature DB >> 18502315

Recovery of motor disability and spasticity in post-stroke after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

J Málly1, E Dinya.   

Abstract

Lately it has been indicated that the stimulation of both sides of the motor cortices with different frequencies of rTMS can improve the behaviour of a paretic arm. We studied the effect of rTMS in severe cases of post-stroke after nearly 10 years. They had wide hemispheric lesion and their paresis had not changed for more than 5 years. The majority of patients could not move their fingers on the affected side. In our study we examined whether the active movement could be induced by rTMS even several years after stroke and which hemisphere (affected or unaffected) stimulated by rTMS would be the best location for attenuating the spasticity and for developing movement in the paretic arm. Sixty-four patients (more than 5 years after stroke in a stable state) were followed for 3 months. They were treated with rTMS with 1 Hz at 30% of 2.3T 100 stimuli per session twice a day for a week. The area to be stimulated was chosen according to the evoked movement by TMS in the paretic arm. That way, four groups were created and compared. In group A, where both hemispheres were stimulated (because of the single stimulation of TMS could induce movement from both sides of hemispheres) the spasticity decreased but the movement could not be influenced. A highly significant improvement in spasticity, in movement induction and in the behaviour of paresis was observed in group B, where before treatment, there was no evoked movement in the paretic arm from stimulating either hemispheres of the brain. For treatment we stimulated the unaffected hemisphere from where the intact arm is moved (ipsilateral to the paretic side). In both groups C (contralateral hemisphere to the paretic arm) and D (ipsilaterally evoked movement in the paretic arm), the spasticity decreased during the first week, but the movement of the paretic arm improved only in group C. It seems that spasticity can be modified by the stimulation either the affected or the unaffected hemisphere, but the induction of movement can be achieved only by the stimulation of an intact motor pathway and its surrounding area (groups B and C). The improvement in paretic extremities can be achieved with rTMS even after years of stroke when the traditional rehabilitation has failed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18502315     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  17 in total

1.  Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery.

Authors:  Chih-Pin Wang; Po-Yi Tsai; Tsui Fen Yang; Kuang-Yao Yang; Chien-Chih Wang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  Comparative Enhancement of Motor Function and BDNF Expression Following Different Brain Stimulation Approaches in an Animal Model of Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Serena-Kaye Kinley-Cooper Sims; Aitana Rizzo; Kern Howard; Ariana Farrand; Heather Boger; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Quantifying Altered Neural Connectivity of the Stretch Reflex in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke.

Authors:  Yuan Yang; Nirvik Sinha; Runfeng Tian; Netta Gurari; Justin M Drogos; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  Brain stimulation: Neuromodulation as a potential treatment for motor recovery following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  E Clayton; S K Kinley-Cooper; R A Weber; D L Adkins
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Corticospinal tract integrity correlates with knee extensor weakness in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Chandramouli Krishnan; Arun Jayaraman; William Z Rymer; James W Stinear
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Motor System Reorganization After Stroke: Stimulating and Training Toward Perfection.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-09

7.  Systematic review of parameters of stimulation, clinical trial design characteristics, and motor outcomes in non-invasive brain stimulation in stroke.

Authors:  Bamidele O Adeyemo; Marcel Simis; Debora Duarte Macea; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Noninvasive brain stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and future views.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2012-09-25

Review 9.  Clinical application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Joonho Shin; EunJoo Yang; KyeHee Cho; Carmelo L Barcenas; Woo Jin Kim; Yusun Min; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Benefits of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for spastic subjects: clinical, functional, and biomechanical parameters for lower limb and walking in five hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  Luc Terreaux; Raphael Gross; Fabien Leboeuf; Hubert Desal; Olivier Hamel; Jean Paul Nguyen; Chantal Pérot; Kévin Buffenoir
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.