Literature DB >> 18502262

Effects of fenofibrate and ezetimibe, both as monotherapy and in coadministration, on cholesterol mass within lipoprotein subfractions and low-density lipoprotein peak particle size in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Diane L Tribble1, Michel Farnier, Geraldine Macdonell, Inna Perevozskaya, Michael J Davies, Barry Gumbiner, Thomas A Musliner.   

Abstract

Coadministration of fenofibrate and ezetimibe (FENO + EZE) produced complementary and favorable effects on the major lipids and lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and non-HDL-C levels, and was well tolerated in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. The current analysis evaluates the effects of FENO and EZE, as monotherapies and in coadministration, on lipoprotein subfractions and LDL particle size distributions in these patients. In a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients with mixed hyperlipidemia were randomized in a 1:3:3:3 ratio to one of 4 treatment groups: placebo, FENO 160 mg/day, EZE 10 mg/day, or FENO 160 mg/day + EZE 10 mg/day. At baseline and study end point, the Vertical Auto Profile II method was used to measure the cholesterol associated with 2 very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) subfractions (VLDL-C1 + 2 and VLDL-C3), intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL-C), and 4 LDL subfractions (LDL-C1 through LDL-C4, from most buoyant to most dense), lipoprotein (Lp) (a), and 2 HDL-C subfractions (HDL-C2 and HDL-C3). The LDL particle size was determined using segmented gradient gel electrophoresis. Fenofibrate reduced cholesterol mass within VLDL, IDL, and dense LDL (primarily LDL-C4) subfractions, and increased cholesterol mass within the more buoyant LDL-C2 subfraction, consistent with a shift to a more buoyant LDL peak particle size. Ezetimibe reduced cholesterol mass within all of the apolipoprotein B-containing particles (eg, VLDL-C, IDL-C, and LDL-C) but did not lead to a shift in the LDL particle size distribution profile. Coadministration of FENO and EZE promoted more pronounced reductions in VLDL-C, IDL-C, and LDL-C, and a preferential decrease in dense LDL subfractions. Fenofibrate and FENO + EZE promoted similar increases in HDL-C2 and HDL-C3. Coadministration of FENO + EZE produced complementary and favorable changes in lipoprotein fractions and subfractions, as assessed by the Vertical Auto Profile II method, in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. These changes reflected the combined effects of FENO in reducing triglycerides-rich lipoproteins and promoting a shift in the LDL particle distribution profile toward larger, more buoyant particles and of EZE in promoting reductions in cholesterol mass across the apolipoprotein B particle spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18502262     DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  10 in total

1.  Kinetic analysis of thermal stability of human low density lipoproteins: a model for LDL fusion in atherogenesis.

Authors:  Mengxiao Lu; Donald L Gantz; Haya Herscovitz; Olga Gursky
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.922

2.  Effect of ezetimibe on low- and high-density lipoprotein subclasses in sitosterolemia.

Authors:  Rgia A Othman; Semone B Myrie; David Mymin; Jean-Baptiste Roullet; Robert D Steiner; Peter J H Jones
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 3.  Dyslipidemia following kidney transplantation: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Stéphanie Badiou; Jean-Paul Cristol; Georges Mourad
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Lipid-modulating treatments for mixed dyslipidemia increase HDL-associated phospholipase A2 activity with differential effects on HDL subfractions.

Authors:  Anastazia Kei; Evangelos Liberopoulos; Costantinos Tellis; Moses Elisaf; Alexandros Tselepis
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.880

5.  Are post-treatment low-density lipoprotein subclass pattern analyses potentially misleading?

Authors:  Harold Bays; Scott Conard; Lawrence A Leiter; Steven Bird; Erin Jensen; Mary E Hanson; Arvind Shah; Andrew M Tershakovec
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Dyslipidaemia of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the case for residual risk reduction after statin treatment.

Authors:  Vasilios G Athyros; Konstantinos Tziomalos; Asterios Karagiannis; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2011-02-24

Review 7.  A review of time courses and predictors of lipid changes with fenofibric acid-statin combination.

Authors:  Theodosios D Filippatos
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 8.  Causes and Consequences of Hypertriglyceridemia.

Authors:  Chris J Packard; Jan Boren; Marja-Riitta Taskinen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  Update on the clinical utility of fenofibrate in mixed dyslipidemias: mechanisms of action and rational prescribing.

Authors:  Michel Farnier
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

10.  Main differences between two highly effective lipid-lowering therapies in subclasses of lipoproteins in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Leticia C S Pinto; Ana P Q Mello; Maria C O Izar; Nagila R T Damasceno; Antonio M F Neto; Carolina N França; Adriano Caixeta; Henrique T Bianco; Rui M S Póvoa; Flavio T Moreira; Amanda S F Bacchin; Francisco A Fonseca
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.876

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.