Literature DB >> 18501948

A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems.

Indu Vedamurthy1, Catherine M Suttle, Jack Alexander, Lisa J Asper.   

Abstract

During infancy and childhood, spatial contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity undergo maturation, and during this period the visual system has considerable plasticity. The purpose of this study was to compare the nature of interocular interactions of these spatial functions in normally sighted children and adults, and to study the extent to which interocular interactions are impaired in anisometropic amblyopia. Spatial functions were measured under three viewing conditions: monocular (fellow eye occluded), dichoptic (uniform stimulus presented to the fellow eye but with a peripheral fusion lock), and binocular. Measurements were made in each eye during monocular and dichoptic viewing. In the contrast sensitivity task, Gabor stimuli were presented in one of two temporal intervals. For the alignment task, a three-element Gabor stimulus was used. The task of the subject was to indicate the direction of displacement of the middle patch with respect to the outer patches. The findings indicate that in children, binocular contrast sensitivity was better than monocular (binocular summation) but so too was dichoptic sensitivity (dichoptic summation). The magnitude of binocular/dichoptic summation was significantly greater in children than in normally sighted adults for contrast sensitivity, but not for alignment sensitivity. In anisometropic amblyopes, however, we find that for the group as a whole the amblyopic eye does not benefit when the fellow eye views a dichoptic stimulus, compared to dark occlusion of that eye. In addition, we found considerable inter-individual variation within the amblyopic group. Implications of these findings for techniques used in vision therapy are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18501948     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Functional burden of strabismus: decreased binocular summation and binocular inhibition.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Zachary Fenoglio; Eileen Birch; Steven Nusinowitz; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Assessing binocular interaction in amblyopia and its clinical feasibility.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Zhong-Lin Lu; Alexandra Miller; Melanie Kazlas; David G Hunter; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impaired Activation of Visual Attention Network for Motion Salience Is Accompanied by Reduced Functional Connectivity between Frontal Eye Fields and Visual Cortex in Strabismic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Sheila G Crewther; Minglong Liang; Robin Laycock; Tao Yu; Bonnie Alexander; David P Crewther; Jian Wang; Zhengqin Yin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Binocular summation in comitant exotropia: Change after surgery.

Authors:  Shaurya Verma; Pallavi Mishra; Siddharth Agrawal; Rajat M Srivastava; Vinita Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Treatment of amblyopia in the adult: insights from a new rodent model of visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Joyce Bonaccorsi; Nicoletta Berardi; Alessandro Sale
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children.

Authors:  Joyce Liebrand-Schurink; Ralf F A Cox; Ger H M B van Rens; Antonius H N Cillessen; Ruud G J Meulenbroek; Frouke N Boonstra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 7.  Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-03-16

8.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.