Literature DB >> 18501748

Enhancing multiple disciplinary teamwork.

Terri E Weaver1.   

Abstract

Multiple disciplinary research provides an opportunity to bring together investigators across disciplines to provide new views and develop innovative approaches to important questions. Through this shared experience, novel paradigms are formed, original frameworks are developed, and new language is generated. Integral to the successful construction of effective cross-disciplinary teams is the recognition of antecedent factors that affect the development of the team such as intrapersonal, social, physical environmental, organizational, and institutional influences. Team functioning is enhanced with well-developed behavioral, affective, interpersonal, and intellectual processes. Outcomes of effective multiple disciplinary research teams include novel ideas, integrative models, new training programs, institutional change, and innovative policies that can also influence the degree to which antecedents and processes contribute to team performance. Ongoing evaluation of team functioning and achievement of designated outcomes ensures the continued development of the multiple disciplinary team and confirmation of this approach as important to the advancement of science.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18501748     DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Outlook        ISSN: 0029-6554            Impact factor:   3.250


  8 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary collaboration applied to clinical research: an example of remote monitoring in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Arin VanWormer; Ruth Lindquist; William Robiner; Stanley Finkelstein
Journal:  Dimens Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2012 May-Jun

2.  Team process in community-based participatory research on maternity care in the Dominican Republic.

Authors:  Jennifer Foster; Fidela Chiang; Rebecca C Hillard; Priscilla Hall; Annemarie Heath
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.393

Review 3.  Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary facial function clinic.

Authors:  S A Sadiq; H A Usmani; S R Saeed
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Evaluating a team-based approach to research capacity building using a matched-pairs study design.

Authors:  Libby Holden; Susan Pager; Xanthe Golenko; Robert S Ware; Robyn Weare
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: a scoping review and domain analysis.

Authors:  Gaetano R Lotrecchiano; Trudy R Mallinson; Tommy Leblanc-Beaudoin; Lisa S Schwartz; Danielle Lazar; Holly J Falk-Krzesinski
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2016-05

6.  A Practical Guide for Building Collaborations Between Clinical Researchers and Engineers: Lessons Learned From a Multidisciplinary Patient Safety Project.

Authors:  Roshun R Sankaran; Jessica M Ameling; Amy E M Cohn; Cyril M Grum; Jennifer Meddings
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 7.  Unpacking Partnership, Engagement, and Collaboration Research to Inform Implementation Strategies Development: Theoretical Frameworks and Emerging Methodologies.

Authors:  Keng-Yen Huang; Simona C Kwon; Sabrina Cheng; Dimitra Kamboukos; Donna Shelley; Laurie M Brotman; Sue A Kaplan; Ogedegbe Olugbenga; Kimberly Hoagwood
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-07-11

8.  Consideration of shared decision making in nursing: a review of clinicians' perceptions and interventions.

Authors:  Noreen M Clark; Belinda W Nelson; Melissa A Valerio; Z Molly Gong; Judith C Taylor-Fishwick; Monica Fletcher
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2009-10-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.