Literature DB >> 18501684

Retention index thresholds for compound matching in GC-MS metabolite profiling.

Nadine Strehmel1, Jan Hummel, Alexander Erban, Katrin Strassburg, Joachim Kopka.   

Abstract

The generation of retention index (RI) libraries is an expensive and time-consuming effort. Procedures for the transfer of RI properties between chromatography variants are, therefore, highly relevant for a shared use. The precision of RI determination and accuracy of RI transfer between 8 method variants employing 5%-phenyl-95%-dimethylpolysiloxane capillary columns was investigated using a series of 9 n-alkanes (C(10)-C(36)). The precision of the RI determination of 13 exemplary fatty acid methyl esters (C(8) ME-C(30) ME) was 0.22-0.33 standard deviation (S.D.) expressed in RI units in low complexity samples. In the presence of complex biological matrices this precision may deteriorate to 0.75-1.11. Application of the previously proposed Kováts, van den Dool or 3rd-5th order polynomial regression algorithms resulted in similar precision of RI calculation. For transfer of empirical van den Dool-RI properties between the chromatography variants 3rd order regression was found to represent the minimal necessary assumption. The range of typical regression coefficients was r(2)=0.9988-0.9998 and accuracy of RI prediction between chromatography variants varied between 5.1 and 19.8 (0.29-0.69%) S.D. of residual RI error, RI(predicted)-RI(determined) (n>64). Accuracy of prediction was enhanced when subsets of chemically similar compound classes were used for regression, for example organic acids and sugars exhibited 0.78 (n=29) and 3.74 (n=37) S.D. of residual RI error, respectively. In conclusion, we suggest use of percent RI error rather than absolute RI units for the definition of matching thresholds. Thresholds of 0.5-1.0% may apply to most transfers between chromatography variants. These thresholds will not solve all matching ambiguities in complex samples. Therefore, we recommend co-analysis of reference substances with each GC-MS profiling experiment. Composition of these defined reference mixtures may best approximate or mimic the quantitative and qualitative composition of the biological matrix under investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18501684     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.04.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  51 in total

1.  A large scale test dataset to determine optimal retention index threshold based on three mass spectral similarity measures.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Imhoi Koo; Bing Wang; Qing-Wei Gao; Chun-Hou Zheng; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  iMatch: a retention index tool for analysis of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Aiqin Fang; Bing Wang; Seong Ho Kim; Bogdan Bogdanov; Zhanxiang Zhou; Craig McClain; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Cytoskeletal Components Define Protein Location to Membrane Microdomains.

Authors:  Witold G Szymanski; Henrik Zauber; Alexander Erban; Michal Gorka; Xu Na Wu; Waltraud X Schulze
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Involvement of Burkholderiaceae and sulfurous volatiles in disease-suppressive soils.

Authors:  Víctor J Carrión; Viviane Cordovez; Olaf Tyc; Desalegn W Etalo; Irene de Bruijn; Victor C L de Jager; Marnix H Medema; Leo Eberl; Jos M Raaijmakers
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Characterization of the Low-Carbon Response Using an ndhR Mutant of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.

Authors:  Stephan Klähn; Isabel Orf; Doreen Schwarz; Jasper K F Matthiessen; Joachim Kopka; Wolfgang R Hess; Martin Hagemann
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Central Metabolic Responses to Ozone and Herbivory Affect Photosynthesis and Stomatal Closure.

Authors:  Stefano Papazian; Eliezer Khaling; Christelle Bonnet; Steve Lassueur; Philippe Reymond; Thomas Moritz; James D Blande; Benedicte R Albrectsen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Predicting Arabidopsis freezing tolerance and heterosis in freezing tolerance from metabolite composition.

Authors:  Marina Korn; Tanja Gärtner; Alexander Erban; Joachim Kopka; Joachim Selbig; Dirk K Hincha
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 13.164

8.  Metabolic profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana epidermal cells.

Authors:  Berit Ebert; Daniela Zöller; Alexander Erban; Ines Fehrle; Jürgen Hartmann; Annette Niehl; Joachim Kopka; Joachim Fisahn
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Metabolic profiling reveals local and systemic responses of host plants to nematode parasitism.

Authors:  Julia Hofmann; Abd El Naser El Ashry; Shahbaz Anwar; Alexander Erban; Joachim Kopka; Florian Grundler
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  ChromA: signal-based retention time alignment for chromatography-mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Nils Hoffmann; Jens Stoye
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.