BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: More information is needed on hypertension control and its evolution in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the degree of blood pressure (BP) control in Spanish hypertensive patients attended in primary care (PC) and to determine the factors associated with poor BP control. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional, multicenter study, carried out in PC settings throughout Spain. Hypertensive patients >or= 18 years, with antihypertensive treatment (>or= 3 months) were consecutively recruited. BP measurement was performed in surgery hours (morning and evening) following standardized methods and averaging 2 consecutive readings. BP control was regarded as optimum when BP values were < 140/90 mmHg in general population and <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: 10,520 hypertensive patients were included (53.7% women), mean age (SD) 64.6 (11.3) years. 41.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.4) presented good systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) control, 46.5% (95% CI, 45.5-47.4) only SBP control and 67.1% (95% CI, 66.2-68.0) only DBP control. 55.6% of patients were treated with combination therapy (41.2% 2 drugs, 11.7% 3 and 2.8% more than 3). BP control was significantly (p<0.001) higher in the evening measurement (48.9%) than in the morning measurement (40.5%), and if patients had taken the treatment before measurement (42.0%) compared with those who had not taken it (38.8%). Factors such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption and surgery hour were associated with poor BP control (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the PRESCAP 2006 study indicate that 4 out of 10 hypertensive patients treated in PC in Spain have an optimal BP control. The degree of control of arterial hypertension has improved remarkably with respect to the PRESCAP 2002 study.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: More information is needed on hypertension control and its evolution in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the degree of blood pressure (BP) control in Spanish hypertensivepatients attended in primary care (PC) and to determine the factors associated with poor BP control. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional, multicenter study, carried out in PC settings throughout Spain. Hypertensivepatients >or= 18 years, with antihypertensive treatment (>or= 3 months) were consecutively recruited. BP measurement was performed in surgery hours (morning and evening) following standardized methods and averaging 2 consecutive readings. BP control was regarded as optimum when BP values were < 140/90 mmHg in general population and <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: 10,520 hypertensivepatients were included (53.7% women), mean age (SD) 64.6 (11.3) years. 41.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.4) presented good systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) control, 46.5% (95% CI, 45.5-47.4) only SBP control and 67.1% (95% CI, 66.2-68.0) only DBP control. 55.6% of patients were treated with combination therapy (41.2% 2 drugs, 11.7% 3 and 2.8% more than 3). BP control was significantly (p<0.001) higher in the evening measurement (48.9%) than in the morning measurement (40.5%), and if patients had taken the treatment before measurement (42.0%) compared with those who had not taken it (38.8%). Factors such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption and surgery hour were associated with poor BP control (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the PRESCAP 2006 study indicate that 4 out of 10 hypertensivepatients treated in PC in Spain have an optimal BP control. The degree of control of arterial hypertension has improved remarkably with respect to the PRESCAP 2002 study.
Authors: Juan C Ruiz; María A Ariza; Belén Aguilera; Mariano Leal; Ramón Gómez; José Abellán Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Carlos Sanchis Doménech; José Luis Llisterri Caro; Vicente Palomo Sanz; Francisco Javier Alonso Moreno; Isidro López Rodríguez; Armando Nevado Loro; Miguel Ángel Zamorano; Natividad Gil García; M Dolores Aguilar Conesa; Pablo Lázaro Y de Mercado Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Gerardo Garzón González; David Rodríguez Morales; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Palomino; David Toledo Gómez; Valentín Hernández Barrera; Angel Gil De Miguel Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: M Belén Ferro-Rey; Alex Roca-Cusachs; Antoni Sicras-Mainar; Carlos Alvarez-Martín; Marina de Salas-Cansado Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2011-01-08 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Isidro Rodríguez-Salceda; Esperanza Escortell-Mayor; Milagros Rico-Blázquez; Rosario Riesgo-Fuertes; Angel Asúnsolo-del Barco; Antonio Valdivia-Pérez; Isabel del Cura-González; Ana B García-Cañón; María F Ortiz-Jiménez; Luisa Cabello-Ballesteros; Sofia Garrido-Elustondo; Laura Chamorro-González; Ricardo Rodríguez-Barrientos Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 3.295