BACKGROUND: Symptoms of neurological decompression incidents (DCS/AGE) can be severe or mild. It is unknown if these differences of symptom presentation represent different clinical entities or if they represent just the spectrum of DCS/AGE. METHODS: 267 cases with DCS/AGE were compared retrospectively and classified into two subgroups, the Type A-DCS/AGE for cases with a severe and often stroke-like symptomatology and the Type B-DCS/AGE for those with milder and sometimes even doubtful neurological symptoms. The main outcome measures were the number of hyperbaric treatments (HTs) needed and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: 42 patients with DCS/AGE were classified as Type A- and 225 patients met the criteria for a Type B-DCS/AGE. Patients with Type A-lesions were more severely affected, needed more hyperbaric treatments and had a less favorable outcome than patients with the Type B-variant. CONCLUSIONS: The Type A- and the Type B-DCS/AGE are likely to be different entities with better clinical outcome in the Type B-variant and possibly significant differences in the underlying pathophysiologies of both variants. Future studies with a particular focus on the up to now inadequately investigated Type B-DCS/AGE are necessary to elucidate such differences in the pathophysiology.
BACKGROUND: Symptoms of neurological decompression incidents (DCS/AGE) can be severe or mild. It is unknown if these differences of symptom presentation represent different clinical entities or if they represent just the spectrum of DCS/AGE. METHODS: 267 cases with DCS/AGE were compared retrospectively and classified into two subgroups, the Type A-DCS/AGE for cases with a severe and often stroke-like symptomatology and the Type B-DCS/AGE for those with milder and sometimes even doubtful neurological symptoms. The main outcome measures were the number of hyperbaric treatments (HTs) needed and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: 42 patients with DCS/AGE were classified as Type A- and 225 patients met the criteria for a Type B-DCS/AGE. Patients with Type A-lesions were more severely affected, needed more hyperbaric treatments and had a less favorable outcome than patients with the Type B-variant. CONCLUSIONS: The Type A- and the Type B-DCS/AGE are likely to be different entities with better clinical outcome in the Type B-variant and possibly significant differences in the underlying pathophysiologies of both variants. Future studies with a particular focus on the up to now inadequately investigated Type B-DCS/AGE are necessary to elucidate such differences in the pathophysiology.