Literature DB >> 18499621

Right- and left-sided Mallinckrodt double-lumen tubes have identical clinical performance.

Jesse M Ehrenfeld1, John L Walsh, Warren S Sandberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left-sided double-lumen tubes are perceived to be safer than right-sided tubes, because they may be less prone to malposition. If this is true, then the incidence and severity of hypoxemia, hypercapnea, and high airway pressures should be higher for right-sided tubes during thoracic surgery than for left-sided tubes.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed thoracic surgical anesthetics between April 15, 2003, and December 31, 2004, using an automated anesthesia information management system. The system automatically records pulse oximetry, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and peak inspiratory pressure data every 30 s. Side of surgery and double-lumen tube placement are also documented. We compared the frequency of right- and left-sided Mallinckrodt tube use by thoracic anesthesiologists. Next, we examined the incidence, duration, and severity of hypoxemia (Spo(2) <90%), hypercapnea (Etco(2) >45 mm Hg) and high airway pressures (peak inspiratory pressure >35 cm H(2)O) for lung and chest wall surgery patients. Group counts and means were compared by standard statistical methods.
RESULTS: Right- (n = 241) and left- (n = 450) sided tubes were almost exclusively used on the side contralateral to surgery. There were no differences in the incidence or duration of hypoxemia, hypercarbia, or high airway pressures. There was a small but significant increase in Etco(2) for patients having left lung ventilation.
CONCLUSIONS: The supposition that left-sided double-lumen tubes are safer than right-sided tubes when intraoperative hypoxemia, hypercapnea, and high airway pressures are used as criteria for safety is not supported by our data comparing the two types of tubes from one manufacturer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18499621     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816f24d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

Review 1.  Anesthesia information management systems: a review of functionality and installation considerations.

Authors:  Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Mohamed A Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Artifacts in research data obtained from an anesthesia information and management system.

Authors:  Nathalie P Kool; Judith A R van Waes; Jilles B Bijker; Linda M Peelen; Leo van Wolfswinkel; Jurgen C de Graaff; Wilton A van Klei
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Anesthesia for thoracic surgery: a survey of middle eastern practice.

Authors:  Abdelazeem Eldawlatly; Ahmed Turkistani; Ben Shelley; Mohamed El-Tahan; Alistair Macfie; John Kinsella
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-07

4.  Prolonged patient emergence time among clinical anesthesia resident trainees.

Authors:  L McLean House; Nathan H Calloway; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

5.  Prediction of Left Double-Lumen Tube Size by Measurement of Cricoid Cartilage Transverse Diameter by Ultrasound and CT Multi-Planar Reconstruction.

Authors:  Chengchao Zhang; Xinlei Qin; Wenyi Zhou; Shuaijie He; Ao Liu; Yu Zhang; Zhigang Dai; Jiangwen Yin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.